Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor fixes #104

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

Minor fixes #104

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

cp-sneha-s
Copy link
Collaborator

@cp-sneha-s cp-sneha-s commented Dec 3, 2024

Purpose

Summary of Changes

Test steps

Conformity

  • Followed git guidelines for creating commit messages and Pull Request guidelines.
  • Self-approved the PR - reviewed the PR as a reviewer and gave it self-approval if everything is ok. If not, made the required changes.
  • Ensured that the PR satisfies all specified requirements in the ticket, including bug fixes and new features.
  • Provided test steps, including steps to reproduce the issue or test the new functionality, ensuring other team members can verify the changes.
  • Added/Updated proper code comments to make it easy-to-understand for other developers.
  • Reused code (if the same code was written twice, made it common and reused it at both places).
  • Removed unused or commented code if not required.
  • Ensured proper Dart naming conventions were used for variables, classes, and methods.
  • Localized user-facing strings.
  • Included screenshots/videos of behavior changes: Provided visual evidence of any changes to UI or behavior for easier review and understanding in the PR description.
  • Implemented proper error handling: Ensured that the code anticipated and handled potential errors and edge cases gracefully.
  • Avoided introducing technical debt: If the PR introduces technical debt, created and linked appropriate tickets for future resolution.
  • Included relevant unit tests: Wrote unit tests that focused on testing behavior and functionality, rather than merely covering lines of code.
  • Ensured code was performant and scalable: Verified that the changes did not introduce performance issues or bottlenecks and could scale as needed.
  • Ensured comments were up-to-date and relevant to the code to describe complex logic and to add understanding for other developers.
  • Marked the PR as ready before submitting it for review.

Visual Evidence (Video, Images or Gif)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the Java Development Kit (JDK) to version 17.0.6 for improved performance and features.
    • Specified the use of Oracle's JDK distribution for both build and deployment workflows.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved visual presentation of date and time pickers by removing the custom barrier color, enhancing user experience.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to two GitHub workflow files and a Dart file. In the .github/workflows/android_build.yml, a distribution parameter is added to the setup-java action, specifying Oracle's JDK. The .github/workflows/android_deploy.yml file sees a similar update, with the JDK version changed from 1.8 to 17.0.6 and the distribution parameter also set to Oracle. Lastly, in lib/ui/widget/date_time_picker.dart, the barrierColor parameter is removed from the date and time picker functions without altering their core functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/android_build.yml Added distribution: 'oracle' to setup-java for both android_build_apk and android_build_aab jobs.
.github/workflows/android_deploy.yml Updated java-version from 1.8 to 17.0.6 and added distribution: 'oracle' to set up JDK 1.8.
lib/ui/widget/date_time_picker.dart Removed barrierColor parameter from showDatePicker and showTimePicker function calls.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix pipeline #103: The changes in this PR also involve modifications to the .github/workflows/android_build.yml and .github/workflows/android_deploy.yml files, specifically updating the setup-java action to use Oracle's JDK, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR.

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where rabbits play,
New JDKs hop in, brightening the day!
With pickers refined, the colors now clear,
We build and deploy without any fear.
Hopping along, our workflows align,
Cheers to the changes, all is divine! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16d160d and 0c14284.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/ui/widget/date_time_picker.dart (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • lib/ui/widget/date_time_picker.dart

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/android_build.yml (1)

22-23: Consider using reusable workflow for Java setup

The Java configuration is identical across both jobs and matches the deployment workflow. While the consistency is good, consider reducing duplication:

  1. Create a reusable workflow for Java setup:
# .github/workflows/setup-java.yml
name: Setup Java
on:
  workflow_call:

jobs:
  setup:
    steps:
      - uses: actions/setup-java@v4
        with:
          distribution: 'oracle'
          java-version: 17.0.6
          cache: 'gradle'
  1. Reference it in both jobs:
jobs:
  android_build_apk:
    uses: ./.github/workflows/setup-java.yml

This would make future Java version or distribution changes easier to maintain.

Also applies to: 79-81

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2c90df and 16d160d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/android_build.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/android_deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • lib/ui/widget/date_time_picker.dart (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • lib/ui/widget/date_time_picker.dart

.github/workflows/android_deploy.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/android_build.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@cp-sneha-s cp-sneha-s merged commit 929667a into main Dec 3, 2024
2 checks passed
This was referenced Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant