We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, we use the file and folder structure from startport. What we should be doing is rather using the recommended folder structure here: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md#recommended-folder-structure
Where it helps readability we should deviate from that. I think Osmosis did a great job structuring their modules: https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/tree/main/x
A good opportunity to tackle this, would be when we upgrade to tendermint 0.35 and 0.46 of the SDK (related to celestiaorg/celestia-core#630 (comment)).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
leaving a comment to remind us to also fix #472 (comment) when we address this issue
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closing this because we have stand-alone modules in the x/ directory
x/
No branches or pull requests
Currently, we use the file and folder structure from startport. What we should be doing is rather using the recommended folder structure here: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md#recommended-folder-structure
Where it helps readability we should deviate from that. I think Osmosis did a great job structuring their modules: https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/tree/main/x
A good opportunity to tackle this, would be when we upgrade to tendermint 0.35 and 0.46 of the SDK (related to celestiaorg/celestia-core#630 (comment)).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: