-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: add goreleaser-check as a require step for the goreleaser build (backport #2772) #2775
Conversation
…2772) <!-- Please read and fill out this form before submitting your PR. Please make sure you have reviewed our contributors guide before submitting your first PR. --> ## Overview Minor update I saw when debugging the CI. This will ensure that the goreleaser step won't run if the goreleaser check fails. This will just clean up the error log a little bit. (cherry picked from commit 36ecb01)
I think we need to backport this? |
I think it's a "nice to have" but doesn't provide end-user benefit so it's subjective whether we backport or not. |
Had to backport #2652 too |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM if CI passes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need to backport this to v1.x, it won't be used for anything AFAIU
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v1.x #2775 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 20.20% 20.20%
=======================================
Files 139 139
Lines 16237 16237
=======================================
Hits 3280 3280
Misses 12649 12649
Partials 308 308 |
IDK what you mean by won't be used for anything. The check added in this PR will run on subsequent PRs to v1.x. I don't expect many changes to the goreleaser config on v1.x but there will likely be at least one change related to fixing Ledger support on v1.x binaries. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rootulp sorry, nvm, my brain is fried
This is an automatic backport of pull request #2772 done by Mergify.
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refresh
will re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebase
will rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio update
will merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>
will backport this PR on<destination>
branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com