Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: add goreleaser-check as a require step for the goreleaser build (backport #2772) #2775

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Oct 27, 2023

This is an automatic backport of pull request #2772 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

…2772)

<!--
Please read and fill out this form before submitting your PR.

Please make sure you have reviewed our contributors guide before
submitting your
first PR.
-->

## Overview
Minor update I saw when debugging the CI. This will ensure that the
goreleaser step won't run if the goreleaser check fails. This will just
clean up the error log a little bit.

(cherry picked from commit 36ecb01)
@celestia-bot celestia-bot requested a review from a team October 27, 2023 02:50
@github-actions github-actions bot added the bot item was created by a bot label Oct 27, 2023
evan-forbes
evan-forbes previously approved these changes Oct 27, 2023
@evan-forbes
Copy link
Member

I think we need to backport this?

@rootulp
Copy link
Collaborator

rootulp commented Oct 27, 2023

I think it's a "nice to have" but doesn't provide end-user benefit so it's subjective whether we backport or not.

rootulp
rootulp previously approved these changes Oct 27, 2023
@rootulp rootulp self-requested a review October 31, 2023 11:04
@rootulp rootulp dismissed their stale review October 31, 2023 11:08

checks not passing

@rootulp
Copy link
Collaborator

rootulp commented Oct 31, 2023

Had to backport #2652 too

@rootulp rootulp self-assigned this Oct 31, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@rootulp rootulp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if CI passes

Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need to backport this to v1.x, it won't be used for anything AFAIU

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2775 (c263627) into v1.x (ada7750) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             v1.x    #2775   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   20.20%   20.20%           
=======================================
  Files         139      139           
  Lines       16237    16237           
=======================================
  Hits         3280     3280           
  Misses      12649    12649           
  Partials      308      308           

@rootulp
Copy link
Collaborator

rootulp commented Oct 31, 2023

IDK what you mean by won't be used for anything. The check added in this PR will run on subsequent PRs to v1.x. I don't expect many changes to the goreleaser config on v1.x but there will likely be at least one change related to fixing Ledger support on v1.x binaries.

Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rootulp sorry, nvm, my brain is fried

@rootulp rootulp merged commit 46128a8 into v1.x Oct 31, 2023
24 of 25 checks passed
@rootulp rootulp deleted the mergify/bp/v1.x/pr-2772 branch October 31, 2023 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot item was created by a bot
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants