Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: use latest version in process proposal test #3029

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

rootulp
Copy link
Collaborator

@rootulp rootulp commented Jan 21, 2024

Closes #3013

@rootulp rootulp self-assigned this Jan 21, 2024
@rootulp rootulp marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2024 04:32
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update in the TestProcessProposal function reflects a shift from an older version (v1.Version) to a more current one (appconsts.LatestVersion) in test cases. This alteration has led to a change in the expected outcomes of the tests, where proposals are now expected to be rejected rather than accepted, aligning the tests with the latest application version in use.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/test/process_proposal_test.go Replaced v1.Version with appconsts.LatestVersion in test cases, changing expected results from ACCEPT to REJECT.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Use v2.Version in process proposal tests (#3013)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Note: Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository by the repository owner. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your comments unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@cmwaters cmwaters left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

I swear almost every PR seems to update the go.work.sum 🤔

@rootulp rootulp merged commit d5a5563 into celestiaorg:main Jan 22, 2024
30 checks passed
@rootulp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rootulp commented Jan 22, 2024

Same

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider using v2.Version in process proposal tests
3 participants