Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: refactor share splitting and merging #637
chore: refactor share splitting and merging #637
Changes from 5 commits
a9468d1
2ca0ed5
6dcff1a
4fc2995
138f40c
fb6b9d7
cad767b
ffa5d08
df122c8
8cc17bf
24ff776
721e31e
a22a810
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[optional][proposal] since this variable may also contain intermediate state roots or evidence
a side benefit is that the comment below is now more precise
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good idea, df122c8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm having a difficult time following the iteration logic in this function. I think it would be beneficial if unit tests verified its behavior (or preferably the behavior of
processContiguousShares
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
UPDATE: disregard, I see there are tests for
processContiguousShares
inshares_test.go
. Thoughts on moving them tomerge_contiguous_shares_test.go
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeeaaaaahhhh tbh I'm having a hard time groking it as well lololol. We could probably rewrite it in a better way. I remember there being a lot of weird edge cases for contiguous shares... it should probably at least be a single function and keep all of the state in there instead of in a struct.
we could also split up the tests, that only makes sense and would hopefully help future readers.