Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAS nodes (tracking issue) #381

Closed
17 tasks done
liamsi opened this issue May 31, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed
17 tasks done

DAS nodes (tracking issue) #381

liamsi opened this issue May 31, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@liamsi
Copy link
Member

liamsi commented May 31, 2021

DAS node types

Now that the MVP DAS light-client is out of the door, we should focus on getting the other node types specified, decide on a few networking and p2p-related questions and actually implement all other node types.

Experiments:

This section needs further discussion and clarification

Lazyledger-core / actual DAS fullnode:

More on Experiments:

Required ADRs, decisions, and components:

Implementation:

Chores:

Nice to haves:

@liamsi liamsi added Epic and removed Epic labels May 31, 2021
@liamsi liamsi changed the title fullnode Full MVP: DAS Fullnodes (tracking issue) Jun 2, 2021
@liamsi liamsi pinned this issue Jun 2, 2021
@liamsi liamsi changed the title Full MVP: DAS Fullnodes (tracking issue) Full MVP: DAS nodes (tracking issue) Jun 13, 2021
@liamsi liamsi changed the title Full MVP: DAS nodes (tracking issue) DAS nodes (tracking issue) Jul 1, 2021
@musalbas
Copy link
Member

Superseded by #491

Should this be closed?

@musalbas musalbas unpinned this issue Aug 13, 2021
@liamsi
Copy link
Member Author

liamsi commented Aug 13, 2021

Yes, let me go through the few open issues and repriotize them, or move them over to #491, or, close them (if no longer relevant).

Not sure how to handle the spec-related ones at the top and the more organizational / work-flow related ones (see the unchecked boxes). Ideally, they should also be prioritized and be part of some tracking issue even if they do not block the dev-net (@adlerjohn @musalbas).

@liamsi
Copy link
Member Author

liamsi commented Aug 13, 2021

OK, moved them over to #491 as well.

@liamsi liamsi closed this as completed Aug 13, 2021
cmwaters pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2023
* docs: Add upgrading guidelines for CometBFT v0.34.27

Signed-off-by: Thane Thomson <[email protected]>

* Expand on env vars fallback support

Signed-off-by: Thane Thomson <[email protected]>

* docs: Add upgrading guidelines to v0.34.x docs

Signed-off-by: Thane Thomson <[email protected]>

* docs: Update docs intro root with upgrading guidelines link

Signed-off-by: Thane Thomson <[email protected]>

* Add note on Go module URL and historical upgrading instructions link

Signed-off-by: Thane Thomson <[email protected]>

* docs: Sync with upgrading root doc

Signed-off-by: Thane Thomson <[email protected]>

* Update UPGRADING.md

* Adds a note about the use of go 1.19

---------

Signed-off-by: Thane Thomson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lasaro <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants