-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding the DataAvailabilityHeader to BlockID #304
Closed
Closed
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d85ce36
change proto, blockID, and mockedIPFS
evan-forbes a118b22
update the blockstore interface to bubble errros and add context
evan-forbes e021e7c
add dah to canonical blockid, debugging, and using the min dah when c…
evan-forbes ea6c1a9
Merge branch 'master' into evan/use-ipfs-for-block-data
evan-forbes 438969a
fix TestBlockStoreSaveLoadBlock
evan-forbes 819b798
fix TestNodeStartStop
evan-forbes 5f2b4a7
remove requirement for error to contain the word "timeout"
evan-forbes 6e223c0
add ctx and error to bs.SaveBlock
evan-forbes 943f990
fix TestPruneBlocks
evan-forbes a8517dd
fix TestBlockFetchAtHeight
evan-forbes 1b61ae9
fix TestHandShakeReplayAll
evan-forbes fc03cc4
fix TestBlockFetchAtHeight
evan-forbes aa8c539
add a few more data availability header
evan-forbes File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just asking: will this PR remove the
PartSetHeader
from theBlockID
or will this rather happen in a separate PR?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that will likely be in #287