-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 931
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: unify the blob.Proof and the CommitmentProof #3821
base: feature_branch_blob_proof
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat!: unify the blob.Proof and the CommitmentProof #3821
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feature_branch_blob_proof #3821 +/- ##
============================================================
Coverage ? 45.40%
============================================================
Files ? 313
Lines ? 21753
Branches ? 0
============================================================
Hits ? 9877
Misses ? 10856
Partials ? 1020 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
// Note: this method can be deprecated because it's doing processing that can | ||
// be done locally. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since our API operates with header's height, deprecating this method requires users to download the header to get the hash.
So, I agree that we can deprecate this method in favour of proof public validate
methods but only after migration from heights to hashes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cool, we can create an issue for it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we had somewhere such an issue or task inside the EPIC. I will double-check and close the issue in this case
Closes #3516 and #3582
Note: added couple notes for reviewers concerning the error handling