-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 551
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rebase: update ceph to reef #4030
Conversation
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
1 similar comment
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
The CI job tries to pull this:
The mirror contains this image:
The mirror contains PR #4031 should probably not include the |
Updates: ceph#4030 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <[email protected]>
CI jobs pull the ceph/ceph:v18 image (without `quay.io`). If the mirroring includes the registry host, the image can not be found. Updates: ceph#4030 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <[email protected]>
#4032 has been created, the mirroring runs nightly, so after merging the PR, a new |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
CI jobs pull the ceph/ceph:v18 image (without `quay.io`). If the mirroring includes the registry host, the image can not be found. Updates: #4030 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <[email protected]>
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
@nixpanic NFS pool creation failing, anything changed in Ceph Reef version? |
https://docs.ceph.com/en/reef/rados/operations/pools/#pool-names mentions its reserved and we should not use it |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
It seems like Reef has some changes with respect to pool creation... Rook usually creates the |
@nixpanic Yes you are correct we were missing extra flag to create pool in cephcsi e2e, added missing flag now. |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
it looks like ceph v18 image is broken today and not able to build cephcsi image like yesterday 🤕 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
Both CI jobs failed with:
This isn't a test that I have seen sporadically fail, so it may point to a change related to the Ceph version. |
CI passed on 1.25,1.26. and 1.27 not sure is it something to do with ceph version, let me check on that one |
Other PRs seem to fail in the same way with RBD resizing on Kubernetes 1.28. It is not only this PR 😢 |
@Mergifyio rebase |
Updating ceph base image to Reef as its the latest ceph release. Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <[email protected]>
update Rook to the latest v12 release. Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <[email protected]>
in recent ceph version .nfs pool creation is failing, as we are sure about creating the pools in the e2e tests, tring to create the pool with required extra agruments to make it successful. Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <[email protected]>
disable ganesha as dnf update is failing on Reef ceph version. Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <[email protected]>
As we dont need to enable nfs modules in ceph v16.2.8 onwards skipping this one. Because of this one we have a regression in nfs export Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <[email protected]>
specify from what ceph versions we need to run nfs service commands and when to skip it. Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <[email protected]>
✅ Branch has been successfully rebased |
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.27 |
/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.27 |
/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.26 |
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.28 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.26 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.28 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.26 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.28 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.25 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.25 |
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.25 |
Testing Reef and seeing everything works.