Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Script updating archive at 2023-11-12T00:34:46Z. [ci skip]
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
ID Bot committed Nov 12, 2023
1 parent 9cfba01 commit 58b2612
Showing 1 changed file with 174 additions and 7 deletions.
181 changes: 174 additions & 7 deletions archive.json
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"magic": "E!vIA5L86J2I",
"timestamp": "2023-11-09T00:31:50.935484+00:00",
"timestamp": "2023-11-12T00:34:43.883614+00:00",
"repo": "cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead",
"labels": [
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -162,15 +162,15 @@
"id": "I_kwDOKeDGj851YJXz",
"title": "\"byte\" vs \"octet\"",
"url": "https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead/issues/15",
"state": "OPEN",
"state": "CLOSED",
"author": "jedisct1",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"assignees": [],
"labels": [],
"body": "The document uses both \"byte\" and \"octet\".\r\n\r\nMaybe we should use only \"octet\" everywhere.",
"createdAt": "2023-10-30T21:35:41Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-07T18:44:27Z",
"closedAt": null,
"updatedAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:44Z",
"closedAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:43Z",
"comments": [
{
"author": "samuel-lucas6",
Expand All @@ -192,6 +192,13 @@
"body": "> Maybe we can use byte everywhere, and mention somewhere that thorough this document, byte refers to a 8-bit sequence? I'm not sure how/where that could be doable, but it may be worth it\r\n\r\nI like that idea, but I'm not sure where that would go. Could we have a sentence at the top of `Conventions and Definitions`? Kind of like the [age spec](https://github.com/C2SP/C2SP/blob/main/age.md) but after the key words bit.",
"createdAt": "2023-11-07T18:44:27Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-07T18:44:27Z"
},
{
"author": "jedisct1",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"body": "Fixed in #22 ",
"createdAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:43Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:43Z"
}
]
},
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -255,15 +262,15 @@
"id": "I_kwDOKeDGj851m44o",
"title": "Mention that AEGIS must not not used as a hash function",
"url": "https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead/issues/19",
"state": "OPEN",
"state": "CLOSED",
"author": "jedisct1",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"assignees": [],
"labels": [],
"body": "AEGIS is a very good and fast MAC, so it could be tempting to use it as a replacement for a hash function.\r\n\r\nBut if the key is known, inputs generating state collisions can be easily crafted. So, we should make that clear somewhere, probably in the security considerations.\r\n",
"createdAt": "2023-11-01T21:18:55Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-05T10:21:51Z",
"closedAt": null,
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T17:30:46Z",
"closedAt": "2023-11-11T17:30:46Z",
"comments": [
{
"author": "samuel-lucas6",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2441,6 +2448,166 @@
"comments": []
}
]
},
{
"number": 22,
"id": "PR_kwDOKeDGj85fENF7",
"title": "Say bytes instead of octets",
"url": "https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead/pull/22",
"state": "MERGED",
"author": "samuel-lucas6",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"assignees": [],
"labels": [],
"body": "Let me know what you think of the sentence placement and phrasing.",
"createdAt": "2023-11-09T18:41:57Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:28Z",
"baseRepository": "cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead",
"baseRefName": "main",
"baseRefOid": "3b0411933a6b4520c0ecc98a9e913c9d524cf280",
"headRepository": "samuel-lucas6/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead",
"headRefName": "main",
"headRefOid": "4445b28351c38355b48c7fdb03fec0fd27014d59",
"closedAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:20Z",
"mergedAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:20Z",
"mergedBy": "jedisct1",
"mergeCommit": {
"oid": "f8190ca5a9d45884ee1f15b9111ca27865f50b52"
},
"comments": [
{
"author": "jedisct1",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"body": "Not a big fan of \"instead of\" (-> \"why didn't you use 'octet', then?\")\r\n\r\nHow about \"interchangeably with\" instead?",
"createdAt": "2023-11-09T18:46:21Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-09T18:46:21Z"
},
{
"author": "jedisct1",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"body": "Thank you Samuel!",
"createdAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:28Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-09T19:59:28Z"
}
],
"reviews": []
},
{
"number": 23,
"id": "PR_kwDOKeDGj85fNas2",
"title": "Mention that AEGIS must not be used as a hash function",
"url": "https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead/pull/23",
"state": "MERGED",
"author": "samuel-lucas6",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"assignees": [],
"labels": [],
"body": "Fixes #19.",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T11:28:40Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T17:30:45Z",
"baseRepository": "cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead",
"baseRefName": "main",
"baseRefOid": "f8190ca5a9d45884ee1f15b9111ca27865f50b52",
"headRepository": "samuel-lucas6/draft-irtf-cfrg-aegis-aead",
"headRefName": "main",
"headRefOid": "4e0e2b660fa5ef88ee50c6995f61cbdeb7c44e78",
"closedAt": "2023-11-11T17:30:45Z",
"mergedAt": "2023-11-11T17:30:45Z",
"mergedBy": "jedisct1",
"mergeCommit": {
"oid": "82e74af44e303f540c041b2982714b5366fcfa4f"
},
"comments": [
{
"author": "jedisct1",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"body": "Looks good!\r\n\r\nThank you Samuel!",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T17:30:42Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T17:30:42Z"
}
],
"reviews": [
{
"id": "PRR_kwDOKeDGj85m4cM5",
"commit": {
"abbreviatedOid": "40f81b9"
},
"author": "jedisct1",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"state": "COMMENTED",
"body": "",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T14:25:59Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T14:26:00Z",
"comments": [
{
"originalPosition": 4,
"body": "\"performing encryption with the message\" can be a bit confusing, as we don't encrypt anything. Maybe replace it with \"by calling the `Encrypt()` function\"?",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T14:25:59Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T14:26:00Z"
}
]
},
{
"id": "PRR_kwDOKeDGj85m4cN-",
"commit": {
"abbreviatedOid": "40f81b9"
},
"author": "jedisct1",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"state": "COMMENTED",
"body": "",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T14:26:42Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T14:26:42Z",
"comments": [
{
"originalPosition": 4,
"body": "\"Both algorithms\" -> maybe \"All the variants\"?",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T14:26:42Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T14:26:42Z"
}
]
},
{
"id": "PRR_kwDOKeDGj85m4dUE",
"commit": {
"abbreviatedOid": "40f81b9"
},
"author": "samuel-lucas6",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"state": "COMMENTED",
"body": "",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T15:10:27Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T15:10:27Z",
"comments": [
{
"originalPosition": 4,
"body": "Both good suggestions. I put `Both algorithms` because that was used for the nonce-respecting setting part, which we might want to change.",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T15:10:27Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T15:10:27Z"
}
]
},
{
"id": "PRR_kwDOKeDGj85m4dWt",
"commit": {
"abbreviatedOid": "40f81b9"
},
"author": "samuel-lucas6",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"state": "COMMENTED",
"body": "",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T15:11:55Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T15:11:55Z",
"comments": [
{
"originalPosition": 4,
"body": "Now I'm debating `Each variant`, but then `However, they` may have to change.",
"createdAt": "2023-11-11T15:11:55Z",
"updatedAt": "2023-11-11T15:12:49Z"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}

0 comments on commit 58b2612

Please sign in to comment.