Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: adding LRE forward() method #8

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2024
Merged

feat: adding LRE forward() method #8

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2024

Conversation

chanind
Copy link
Owner

@chanind chanind commented Aug 4, 2024

This PR adds a forward() method to the Lre class to match LowRankLre and InvertedLre

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.88889% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.61%. Comparing base (5fb2681) to head (e95f31b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
linear_relational/Lre.py 88.88% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #8      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.34%   90.61%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        1025     1034       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits          926      937      +11     
+ Misses         99       97       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chanind chanind merged commit 9558e5f into main Aug 4, 2024
2 checks passed
@chanind chanind deleted the lre-forward branch August 4, 2024 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants