Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Groestlcoin (GRS) #15

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

HashEngineering
Copy link

This PR will add support for Groestlcoin addresses. Groestlcoin uses a new hash for the checksum of the addresses and that is imported from npm instead of including the file directly with the hash function as with Blake.

Since according to my comment on issue #10 this library only supports bech32 addresses for bitcoin, the tests for bech32 addresses have been commented out.

@HashEngineering
Copy link
Author

If this PR needs to be rebased I am happy to do that if you don't use Squash and Merge.

@gruve-p
Copy link

gruve-p commented Mar 2, 2020

@christsim Let us know if this PR is ok to get merged or something else needs to be fixed also

@gruve-p
Copy link

gruve-p commented May 5, 2020

@christsim Fixed conflicts and ready for review. This has been implemented and tested on Trezor: trezor@b213f7a

@gruve-p
Copy link

gruve-p commented May 24, 2020

@christsim Fixed conflicts again and ready for review.

@gruve-p
Copy link

gruve-p commented Nov 10, 2020

@christsim Let us know if you have a chance to review

@gruve-p
Copy link

gruve-p commented Feb 12, 2021

@christsim rebased on upstream to fix conflicts

@gruve-p
Copy link

gruve-p commented Oct 9, 2021

@christsim rebased

@gruve-p gruve-p force-pushed the add-grs branch 2 times, most recently from 27bcda3 to 2d815fa Compare February 3, 2022 19:37
@gruve-p
Copy link

gruve-p commented Feb 3, 2022

@christsim rebased again

@gruve-p
Copy link

gruve-p commented Dec 13, 2022

@christsim Is this PR unwanted?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants