This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 22, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Current setup will generate two headless svc´s, these are
<role>-<job>-set
and<role>-set
.When using the
service_name
key in an specific job, in order to rename the svc´s, having both headless svc´s will lead to duplicate svc´s .A more precise example is the
nats
role. Without using theservice_name
key in aninstance_group
job, the headless svcs will be:When using the
service_name
key, to enforce the name ofuaa
. the headless svcs will be:which will lead to the svc´s duplication.
After speaking with @viovanov about this, he mentioned that the the
<role>-<job>-set
svc, is not widely used, and only a reference to it is found in:Therefore this PR to remove the
<role>-<job>-set
svc .