Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inactive users to be deleted #1029

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

According to the rules for inactivity defined in RFC-0025 following users will be deleted:
@nebhale
@sboyajyan
@radoslav-tomov
@jimconner
According to the revocation policy in the RFC, users have two weeks to refute this revocation, if they wish by commenting on this pull-request and open a new pull-request to be re-added as contributor after this one is merged.
As alternative, if you are active in a working group please check the promotion rules and if you are eligible and wish apply for a role in that working group.

Warning:
Inactive users of Working Group "Service Management" are:
@rsampaio
@anoopjb
@cf-gitbot
@swati1102
@abh1kg
Inactive users of Working Group "Foundational Infrastructure" are:
@colins
@ShilpaChandrashekara
Inactive users of Working Group "CF on K8s" are:
@clintyoshimura
@eirinici
@matt-royal
@akrishna90
Inactive users of Working Group "Paketo" are:
@fg-j
@accrazed
@joshuatcasey
Inactive users of Working Group "App Runtime Interfaces" are:
@cf-frontend
@MerricdeLauney
Inactive users of Working Group "App Runtime Platform" are:
@reneighbor

@beyhan beyhan requested review from a team, rkoster, beyhan, stephanme, ameowlia and ChrisMcGowan and removed request for a team December 3, 2024 07:26
@beyhan beyhan added the toc label Dec 3, 2024
@a-b
Copy link
Member

a-b commented Dec 3, 2024

Should we conduct exit interviews for users who have become inactive?

@beyhan
Copy link
Member

beyhan commented Dec 6, 2024

Should we conduct exit interviews for users who have become inactive?

Is the idea to get feedback about the CF foundation and the process we have to manage maintainers?

In general, I would encourage every WG execution lead to seek ways to get feedback from the WGs' reviewers/approvers and then discuss that with the TOC.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants