feat: tweak typography and update webfonts #1955
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- updates inter font to v4 (fixes the weird letter spacing) - updates roboto mono to variable font (allows arbitrary weights) - implements dynamic line height CSS that adjusts to font size matching the actual font (more consistent vs. previously overriding some elements that were too far off). Body text line height very slightly higher as a result. - reduces weight on the code font slightly to match the visual weight better to the body font - applies "balance" text wrapping to page title (aims at same length lines if the title wraps) - applies "pretty" text wrapping to any content (avoids single words in last line of a paragraph) (chrome only) - fix spacing and line heights in chat output
|
|
Preview URLs:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rainy weekend hobby fiddling: typography finetuning
Best way to compare is having current docs kit documentation side by side with the preview of this PR on a large monitor. Some screenshots below.
Topics that are rather fixes than changes:
Changes that are visual differences (happy to tweak according to feedback, some is stylistic, some legibiliy oriented)
Screenshot examples (left new, right existing)
general typography and lighter code font weight: