-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refact Next() in mergeiterator.go #22712
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
store/cachekv/internal/mergeiterator.go (3)
53-72
: Add documentation for the refactored logicWhile the code is more readable now, please add a comment block explaining the three main cases handled by this method:
- When parent is invalid
- When cache is invalid
- When both are valid
// Next implements Iterator +// It advances the iterator based on three cases: +// 1. If parent is invalid, advance the cache iterator +// 2. If cache is invalid, advance the parent iterator +// 3. If both are valid, compare their keys and advance accordingly: +// - If parent key < cache key: advance parent +// - If keys are equal: advance both +// - If parent key > cache key: advance cache func (iter *cacheMergeIterator) Next() {🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
56-56: File is not
gci
-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order(gci)
56-56
: Fix inconsistent spacing in else-if blockThere's an inconsistent space before the opening brace in the else-if condition.
- } else if !iter.cache.Valid(){ + } else if !iter.cache.Valid() {🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
56-56: File is not
gci
-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order(gci)
59-71
: Consider simplifying the comparison logicThe switch statement inside the else block could be simplified to make the code more concise and maintainable.
} else { // Both iterators are valid, so we compare their keys keyP, keyC := iter.parent.Key(), iter.cache.Key() - switch iter.compare(keyP, keyC) { - case -1: // parent < cache - iter.parent.Next() // Advance parent - case 0: // parent == cache - iter.parent.Next() // Advance both iterators, since they are equal + cmp := iter.compare(keyP, keyC) + if cmp <= 0 { // parent <= cache + iter.parent.Next() + if cmp == 0 { + iter.cache.Next() + } + } else { // parent > cache iter.cache.Next() - case 1: // parent > cache - iter.cache.Next() // Advance cache } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
store/cachekv/internal/mergeiterator.go
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
store/cachekv/internal/mergeiterator.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
store/cachekv/internal/mergeiterator.go
56-56: File is not gci
-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order
(gci)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
store/cachekv/internal/mergeiterator.go (1)
53-72
: LGTM: Well-integrated refactoring
The refactored Next()
method:
- Maintains the iterator's contract
- Preserves the behavior with
skipUntilExistsOrInvalid
- Aligns with the existing error handling through
assertValid
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
56-56: File is not gci
-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order
(gci)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey! Thanks for this PR but switching a switch statement to an if/else doesn't add anything here.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Next
method, enhancing its reliability and readability.Documentation
Next
method, reflecting the new control flow structure.