Skip to content

Issues: cplusplus/sender-receiver

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

140 Open 118 Closed
140 Open 118 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Figure out how/whether we should use P2830 "Standardized Constexpr Type Ordering" in sender/receiver design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0
#330 opened Feb 15, 2025 by lewissbaker
3
potentially throwing run_loop::finish can cause sync_wait to call terminate or hang bug Something isn't working P0 wording
#329 opened Feb 13, 2025 by ericniebler
1
define an execution environment's salient properties bug Something isn't working P1
#328 opened Feb 11, 2025 by ericniebler
1
[exec.snd.concepts] sender_to concept should avoid checking that the receiver's completion-methods are present design needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0
#327 opened Feb 8, 2025 by lewissbaker
@lewissbaker
[exec.connect] wording needs to ensure that in connect(sndr, rcvr) that rcvr expression is only evaluated once bug Something isn't working P2 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits wording
#325 opened Feb 5, 2025 by lewissbaker
2
[exec.snd.expos] Not clear if get-domain-late should evaluate the get_domain() expression or default-construct a domain of the type returned by get_domain() bug Something isn't working wording
#324 opened Feb 4, 2025 by lewissbaker
Should set_value/error/stopped CPOs require that member-functions return void? bug Something isn't working design P0
#323 opened Feb 4, 2025 by lewissbaker
@ericniebler
2
receiver/sender constraint that checks get_env(rcvr) is valid redundantly checks the result is queryable editorial enhancement New feature or request wording
#322 opened Feb 3, 2025 by lewissbaker
2
receiver/sender concepts require get_env but this has a fallback that accepts any type enhancement New feature or request wording
#321 opened Feb 3, 2025 by lewissbaker
alias template connect_result_t should be constrained with sender_to bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#320 opened Feb 2, 2025 by ericniebler
3
let_[*].transform_env is specified in terms of the let_* sender itself instead of its child bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#319 opened Feb 2, 2025 by ericniebler
1
specification of as-sndr2(Sig) in [exec.let] is incomplete bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#318 opened Feb 2, 2025 by ericniebler
1
Several algorithms are not applying FWD-ENV as they should bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#317 opened Jan 21, 2025 by ericniebler
1
let_value is not applying FWD-ENV as it should bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#316 opened Jan 21, 2025 by ericniebler
when_all's receiver's environment is incorrectly forwarding all queries bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#315 opened Jan 21, 2025 by ericniebler
constraints on into_variant's get-state function are incorrect bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#314 opened Jan 20, 2025 by ericniebler
constraints on schedule_from's get-state function are incorrect bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#313 opened Jan 19, 2025 by ericniebler
The operation_state concept can be simplified bug Something isn't working P2 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#312 opened Jan 14, 2025 by ericniebler
1
stopped_as_optional tests constraints satisfaction of self instead of child bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#311 opened Jan 14, 2025 by ericniebler
with-await-transform::await_transform should not use a deduced return type bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#309 opened Jan 7, 2025 by t3nsor
2
constraints on user customizations of standard sender algorithms are incorrectly specified bug Something isn't working needs-proposed-resolution This issue does not yet have a proposed resolution but needs one P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#308 opened Jan 2, 2025 by ericniebler
1
specification of completion-signatures-for in [exec.snd.expos]/p39 is recursive bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#307 opened Dec 31, 2024 by ericniebler
2
restore the enable_sender boolean variable template bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#306 opened Dec 5, 2024 by ericniebler
1
schedule_from isn't starting the schedule sender if decay-copying results throws bug Something isn't working P1 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#304 opened Nov 21, 2024 by ericniebler
2
Add execution::invoke() algorithm enhancement New feature or request good-first-issue Something to try if you're new to the project needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P1
#303 opened Nov 18, 2024 by lewissbaker
ProTip! no:milestone will show everything without a milestone.