Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: ReadOptions mutated by reference release in iterator fix is not included #1758

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

mmsqe
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmsqe mmsqe commented Feb 27, 2025

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

  • Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
  • Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
  • Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
  • Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
  • Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
  • Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
  • Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
  • Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
  • If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
  • If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
  • If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
  • If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
  • If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved an issue impacting data iteration, enhancing overall system stability.
  • Chores

    • Updated underlying dependencies to a more reliable version for improved performance and consistency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the project in two primary ways. First, it adds a new bug fix entry in the CHANGELOG.md under the "Bug Fixes" section referencing PR #1758 to address an issue with ReadOptions mutation in iterators. Second, it updates the grocksdb dependency by replacing github.com/linxGnu/grocksdb with github.com/mmsqe/grocksdb in both the go.mod and gomod2nix.toml files, with corresponding updates to the module version and hash.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added a new bug fix entry under "Bug Fixes" for versiondb to avoid ReadOptions being mutated by reference release in iterators (PR #1758).
go.mod, gomod2nix.toml Updated grocksdb dependency by replacing github.com/linxGnu/grocksdb with github.com/mmsqe/grocksdb. The go.mod now includes a new replacement directive, and gomod2nix.toml updates the module version (to v0.0.0-20250224034712-04aa63064718), the hash, and adds a replaced field.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • calvinaco
  • yihuang

Poem

I’m a rabbit, hopping through lines of code,
Bug fixes bloom like carrots on the road,
Dependencies pruned with a careful touch,
My code burrow’s brighter, thanks so much,
Cheers from my warren—happy bytes to all! 🥕🐰


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1297d62 and 0811f88.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • gomod2nix.toml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
  • GitHub Check: install-runsim
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (gas)
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (slow)
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (upgrade)
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (gov)
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (ica)
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc_update_client)
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc_timeout)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-14)
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc_rly_gas)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc_rly_evm)
  • GitHub Check: unittest
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (ibc)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
  • GitHub Check: integration_tests (unmarked)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
go.mod (1)

280-280: Updated grocksdb Dependency Replacement.
The replacement directive now replaces github.com/linxGnu/grocksdb with github.com/mmsqe/grocksdb at version v0.0.0-20250224034712-04aa63064718. This change is consistent with the intended dependency upgrade discussed in PR #1758 and aligns with the upstream fix for the ReadOptions mutation issue. Please double-check that all downstream references and integration tests account for any API changes introduced by this new dependency.

gomod2nix.toml (1)

459-461: Updated grocksdb Module Configuration.
The module configuration for github.com/linxGnu/grocksdb has been updated to version v0.0.0-20250224034712-04aa63064718 with a new hash and the introduction of the replaced field set to github.com/mmsqe/grocksdb. This update mirrors the change in go.mod. Please verify that the provided hash
sha256-KUHE5+SHapE+1CPdwmEXarwr3Vi8JB9jZNY/Ih+OM8g=
matches the expected output from the new dependency and that it indeed incorporates the fix for the ReadOptions mutation issue.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.58%. Comparing base (a3c2f70) to head (0811f88).
Report is 45 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1758       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   16.87%   35.58%   +18.70%     
===========================================
  Files          72      126       +54     
  Lines        6163    11924     +5761     
===========================================
+ Hits         1040     4243     +3203     
- Misses       5000     7256     +2256     
- Partials      123      425      +302     

see 71 files with indirect coverage changes

@mmsqe mmsqe marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 17:00
@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2025 17:00
@mmsqe mmsqe requested review from calvinaco and leejw51crypto and removed request for a team February 27, 2025 17:00
@mmsqe mmsqe enabled auto-merge February 27, 2025 17:00
@mmsqe mmsqe added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 27, 2025
Merged via the queue into crypto-org-chain:main with commit e16e55b Feb 27, 2025
44 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants