Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fair comparison? #29

Open
yifliu3 opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Fair comparison? #29

yifliu3 opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@yifliu3
Copy link

yifliu3 commented Nov 23, 2024

Dear devs,

Congratulations on your great work. I found NoPoSplat is trained and tested on the re10k dataset, while the comparison methods are trained on different datasets. So I'm wondering if this comparison is fair?

@botaoye
Copy link
Collaborator

botaoye commented Nov 24, 2024

Hi, thank you for your interest in our work. I am not sure what task you are referring to.

  • For NVS, we trained and evaluated according to the previous pixelSplat and MVSplat settings, so it was trained on the same dataset.
  • For pose estimation, we agree that we trained on RE10K, while RoMa or MASt3R were not trained on RE10K. However, this is actually one of our strengths as we do not need ground truth depth for training, so we can train our method on video datasets such as RE10K, whereas RoMa or MASt3R cannot. In addition, we also evaluated our method on the ACID and ScanNet datasets, on which we did not train. RoMa was trained on the ScanNet dataset, but we were still able to outperform it when zero-shot generalize to it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants