Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding getHotMatches Function #29

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Adding getHotMatches Function #29

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

honjes
Copy link

@honjes honjes commented Oct 14, 2019

  • Adding the function from Add getMatches and getHotMatches #2
  • Adding the new function to Readme and the example projects
  • Moving the attribute id for getSingleMatch from the constructor too the function
  • Adding utility function too get easyer arrays out of Cheerio Elements
  • Adding more accurate descriptions too the Tests
  • Adding tests for the getHoMatches function

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 14, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #29 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #29   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           5      6    +1     
  Lines         109    137   +28     
  Branches        4      4           
=====================================
+ Hits          109    137   +28
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/utility.ts 100% <100%> (ø)
src/matches.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 408e759...b1c7c4c. Read the comment docs.

@dajk dajk force-pushed the master branch 5 times, most recently from 72ab9d1 to 431c381 Compare February 7, 2021 03:46
@dajk dajk closed this May 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants