Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 1.9.latest] Always emit warning when microbatch models lack any filtered input node #11199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Backport 2eb1a5c from #11196.

…de (#11196)

* Update `TestMicrobatchWithInputWithoutEventTime` to check running again raises warning

The first time the project is run, the appropriate warning about inputs is raised. However,
the warning is only being raised when a full parse happens. When partial parsing happens
the warning isn't getting raised. In the next commit we'll fix this issue. This commit updates
the test to show that the second run (with partial parsing) doesn't raise the update, and thus
the test fails.

* Update manifest loading to _always_ check microbatch model inputs

Of note we are at the point where multiple validations are iterating
all of the nodes in a manifest. We should refactor these _soon_ such that
we are not iterating over the same list multiple times.

* Add changie doc

(cherry picked from commit 2eb1a5c)
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 15:17
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Jan 8, 2025
@QMalcolm QMalcolm closed this Jan 8, 2025
@QMalcolm QMalcolm reopened this Jan 8, 2025
@QMalcolm QMalcolm merged commit 42a58bb into 1.9.latest Jan 8, 2025
56 checks passed
@QMalcolm QMalcolm deleted the backport-11196-to-1.9.latest branch January 8, 2025 18:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.06%. Comparing base (6a9e35a) to head (e2e2c15).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 1.9.latest.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           1.9.latest   #11199      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       89.14%   89.06%   -0.08%     
==============================================
  Files             183      183              
  Lines           23890    23895       +5     
==============================================
- Hits            21296    21283      -13     
- Misses           2594     2612      +18     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 86.40% <93.33%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
unit 62.11% <6.66%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
Unit Tests 62.11% <6.66%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Integration Tests 86.40% <93.33%> (-0.17%) ⬇️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant