Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: move arg docs from Variant to sub Arguments #4369

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Nov 17, 2024

See deepmodeling/dargs#82

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced documentation for various descriptor arguments and fitting configurations, improving clarity and usability.
    • Added detailed descriptions for descriptors related to the smooth edition of Deep Potential.
    • Updated registration of descriptor arguments to include new documentation strings for better guidance on functionality and expected parameters.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the documentation within the deepmd/utils/argcheck.py file. Several new documentation strings have been added for various descriptor arguments and fitting configurations, providing detailed explanations of their purpose and usage. The registration of descriptor arguments has been updated to include these new documentation strings, improving clarity without altering the underlying logic or functionality of the code.

Changes

File Change Summary
deepmd/utils/argcheck.py Added descriptive documentation strings for various descriptor arguments (loc_frame, se_e2_a, se_e2_r, etc.) and fitting configurations (ener, dos, etc.). Updated method signatures to include these new documentation strings.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ArgCheck
    User->>ArgCheck: Request descriptor registration
    ArgCheck->>ArgCheck: Register descriptor with documentation
    ArgCheck-->>User: Provide confirmation of registration
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
deepmd/utils/argcheck.py (3)

43-57: Documentation is clear but could be enhanced further.

The documentation strings are well-written and informative. Consider these enhancements:

  1. Add code examples for complex configurations
  2. Add cross-references to related parameters
  3. Include typical value ranges where applicable

Example enhancement for doc_se_e2_a:

-doc_se_e2_a = "Used by the smooth edition of Deep Potential. The full relative coordinates are used to construct the descriptor."
+doc_se_e2_a = """Used by the smooth edition of Deep Potential. The full relative coordinates are used to construct the descriptor.
+
+Example configuration:
+```python
+{
+    "type": "se_e2_a",
+    "sel": [46, 92],
+    "rcut": 6.0,
+    "rcut_smth": 0.5
+}
+```
+
+Related parameters:
+- sel: Number of neighbors to select
+- rcut: Cutoff radius
+- rcut_smth: Smoothing cutoff
+"""

Line range hint 247-268: Backend-specific notes could be more prominent.

The backend-specific notes (e.g., "Supported Backend: TensorFlow") are included in the documentation but could be more prominent. Consider:

  1. Using a consistent format for backend support notes
  2. Adding visual separation for backend-specific sections
  3. Including version requirements if applicable

Example enhancement:

-@descrpt_args_plugin.register("loc_frame", doc=doc_only_tf_supported + doc_loc_frame)
+@descrpt_args_plugin.register(
+    "loc_frame",
+    doc=f"""
+    {doc_only_tf_supported}
+    ----------------------------------------
+    {doc_loc_frame}
+    """
+)

Also applies to: 336-338, 393-395


1365-1365: Consider adding type hints to improve code maintainability.

The function registrations would benefit from explicit return type hints. This would improve code maintainability and IDE support.

Example enhancement:

-@descrpt_args_plugin.register("se_a_mask", doc=doc_only_tf_supported + doc_se_a_mask)
-def descrpt_se_a_mask_args():
+@descrpt_args_plugin.register("se_a_mask", doc=doc_only_tf_supported + doc_se_a_mask)
+def descrpt_se_a_mask_args() -> list[Argument]:

Also applies to: 1419-1419, 1432-1432, 1508-1508, 1596-1596, 1650-1650, 1689-1691, 1720-1727

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ad4289 and 805d2ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deepmd/utils/argcheck.py (17 hunks)

@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as draft November 17, 2024 07:07
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.50%. Comparing base (0ad4289) to head (805d2ec).
Report is 5 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4369      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.50%   84.50%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         596      596              
  Lines       56665    56670       +5     
  Branches     3459     3460       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        47884    47888       +4     
  Misses       7654     7654              
- Partials     1127     1128       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@njzjz
Copy link
Member Author

njzjz commented Nov 17, 2024

image

@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2024 21:56
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit b9303c7 Nov 19, 2024
60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants