feat: adding btt tests for bPool setters #166
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
0xteddybear
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2024
0xteddybear
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2024
* feat: adding BTT tests for BPool getters * feat: adding tests for spotPrice getters * feat: adding btt tests for bPool setters (#166) * fix: rm legacy bPool tests * fix: manually calculating spot price * fix: test issues on merge conflicts * fix: using funny spot prices --------- Co-authored-by: teddy <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
isn't pretty, but there's no "valid for all" scenario in the BPool miscelaneous test, so i'm ok with declaring the pre-conditions in each leaf of the tree, open to discuss