Deep Q&A

Table of Contents

• Presentation
• Installation
• Running
  • Chatbot
  • Web interface
• Results
• Improvements

Presentation

This work tries to reproduce the results of A Neural Conversational Model (aka the Google chatbot). It uses a RNN (seq2seq model) for sentence predictions. It is done using python and TensorFlow.

The loading corpus part of the program is inspired by the Torch neuralconvo from macournoyer.

For now, DeepQA support the following dialog corpus:

• Cornell Movie Dialogs corpus (default). Already included when cloning the repository.
• OpenSubtitles (thanks to Eschnou). Much bigger corpus (but also noisier). To use it, follow those instructions and use the flag --corpus opensubs.
• Supreme Court Conversation Data (thanks to julien-c). Available using --corpus scotus. See the instructions for installation.

Installation

The program requires the following dependencies (easy to install using pip):

• python 3.5
• tensorflow (tested with v0.12)
• numpy
• CUDA (for using GPU)
• nltk (natural language toolkit for tokenized the sentences)
• tqdm (for the nice progression bars)

You might also need to download additional data to make nltk work.

python3 -m nltk.downloader punkt

The Cornell dataset is already included. For the other datasets, look at the readme files into their respective folders (inside data/).

The web interface requires some additional packages:

• django (tested with 1.10)
• channels
• Redis (see here)
• asgi_redis (at least 1.0)

A Docker installation is also available. More detailed instructions here.

Running

Chatbot

To train the model, simply run main.py. Once trained, you can test the results with main.py --test (results generated in 'save/model/samples_predictions.txt') or main.py --test interactive (more fun).

Here are some flags which could be useful. For more help and options, use python main.py -h:

• --modelTag <name>: allow to give a name to the current model to differentiate between them when testing/training.
• --keelAll: use this flag when training if when testing, you want to see the predictions at different steps (it can be interesting to see the program changes its name and age as the training progress). Warning: It can quickly take a lot of storage space if you don't increase the --saveEvey option.
• --verbose: when testing, will print the sentences as they are computed.
• --playDataset: show some dialogue samples from the dataset (can be use conjointly with --createDataset if this is the only action you want to perform).

To visualize the computational graph and the cost with TensorBoard, just run tensorboard --logdir save/.

By default, the network architecture is a standard encoder/decoder with two LSTM layers (hidden size of 256) and an embedding size for the vocabulary of 32. The network is trained using ADAM. The maximum sentence length is set to 10 words, but can be increased.

Web interface

Once trained, it's possible to chat with it using a more user friendly interface. The server will look at the model present on save/model-server/model.ckpt. The first time you want to use it, you'll need to configure it with:

export CHATBOT_SECRET_KEY "my-secret-key"
cd chatbot_website/
python manage.py makemigrations
python manage.py migrate

Then, to launch the server locally, use the following commands:

cd chatbot_website/
redis-server &  # Launch Redis in background
python manage.py runserver

After launch, the interface should be available on http://localhost:8000/. If you want to deploy the program on a server, use python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0 instead. More info here.

Results

Surprisingly, it's possible to get some results after only 1 or 2 hours of training (on a GeForce GT 740M), by drastically reducing the input sequence to 5 words and output to 3 (plus the go and eos tokens) and by using a small embedding size (something like 25). Since then I modified the code and now the output length has to match the input one but you can still reproduce the original results, using this version. Of course, the network won't be really chatty:

Q: Hi
A: Hi.

Q: What is your name ?
A: Laura.

Q: What does that mean ?
A: I dunno.

Q: How old are you ?
A: thirty-five.

Q: Will Google hire me ?
A: No.

Q: Tell me the alphabet
A: Fuck you.

Q: That's not nice
A: Yeah.

Here is some case where it fails:

Q: Who is Laura ?
A: My brother.

Q: Say 'goodbye'
A: Alright.

Q: What is cooking ?
A: A channel.

Q: Can you say no ?
A: No.

Q: Two plus two
A: Manny...

With longer sentences, the network is much slower to train. After 250000 iterations with maxLength=10, the network still mainly gives evasive answers (by answering most of the open ended questions by 'I don't know') but it seems to have integrated some basic semantic:

Q: When are the fireworks ?
A: Tomorrow.

Q: What color ?
A: Gray.

Q: Which apple ?
A: That's the first one.

Q: What time is it ?
A: Eleven o'clock.

Q: Who is Skywalker ?
A: She's a freelance bio-exorcist.

Q: Who is John ?
A: The old man.

Q: Who is Jenny ?
A: The man who killed herself.

Q: When were you born ?
A: Soon.

As shown on the last questions, the network still does some confusion between the genders and the present/future. I also tried some deeper philosophical questions with more or less success.

Q: What is the purpose of being intelligent ?
A: The man are obsolete.

Q: What is immoral ?
A: The truth.

Q: What is morality ?
A: The worst.

Q: What is the purpose of existence ?
A: It 's private.

Q: What happens if machines can think ?
A: I think I'll just lie with you.

The model I trained is quite limited by the embedding size I put and by its size, and by the training corpus size. Its 'thought vector' is also probably too small to answer the kind of following:

Q: My name is David. What is my name ?
A: Debbie.

Q: My name is John. What is my name ?
A: Carl Smith.

Q: How many legs does a cat have ?
A: Four.

Q: How many legs does a spider have ?
A: Four.

Q: Do you prefer football or soccer ?
A: Whiskey.

It also seems to overfit as sometimes it will just pop out sentences from its training set unrelated to the question. Adding some dropout should reduce the issue.

Q: I play tennis. What do I play ?
A: I'm going to get laid.

Q: What color is the sky ?
A: One of the deputies is everywhere.

You can find a pre-trained model here. Don't expect spectacular results though. If you have a high-end GPU, you could try to increase the network parameters and train a better model.

Improvements

In addition to trying larger/deeper model, there are a lot of small improvements which could be tested. Don't hesitate to send a pull request if you implement one of those. Here are some ideas:

• For now, the predictions are deterministic (the network just take the most likely output) so when answering a question, the network will always gives the same answer. By adding a sampling mechanism, the network could give more diverse (and maybe more interesting) answers. The easiest way to do that is to sample the next predicted word from the SoftMax probability distribution. By combining that with the loop_function argument of tf.nn.seq2seq.rnn_decoder, it shouldn't be too difficult to add. After that, it should be possible to play with the SoftMax temperature to get more conservative or exotic predictions.
• Adding attention could potentially improve the predictions, especially for longer sentences. It should be straightforward by replacing embedding_rnn_seq2seq by embedding_attention_seq2seq on model.py.
• Having more data usually don't hurt. Training on a bigger corpus should be beneficial. OpenSubtitles seems the biggest for now. Another trick to artificially increase the dataset size when creating the corpus could be to split the sentences of each training sample (ex: from the sample Q:Sentence 1. Sentence 2. => A:Sentence X. Sentence Y. we could generate 3 new samples: Q:Sentence 1. Sentence 2. => A:Sentence X., Q:Sentence 2. => A:Sentence X. Sentence Y. and Q:Sentence 2. => A:Sentence X.. Warning: other combinations like Q:Sentence 1. => A:Sentence X. won't work because it would break the transition 2 => X which links the question to the answer)
• The testing curve should really be monitored as done in my other music generation project. This would greatly help to see the impact of dropout on overfitting. For now it's just done empirically by manually checking the testing prediction at different training steps.
• For now, the questions are independent from each other. To link questions together, a straightforward way would be to feed all previous questions and answer to the encoder before giving the answer. Some caching could be done on the final encoder stated to avoid recomputing it each time. To improve the accuracy, the network should be retrain on entire dialogues instead of just individual QA. Also when feeding the previous dialogue to the encoder, new tokens <Q> and <A> could be added so the encoder knows when the interlocutor is changing. I'm not sure though that the simple seq2seq model would be sufficient to capture long term dependencies between sentences. Adding a bucket system to group similar input lengths together could greatly improve training speed.