Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Elaborate on SubDomains for BCs w MPI #2491

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

georgebisbas
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.29%. Comparing base (b95b323) to head (9656baf).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
devito/types/dense.py 33.33% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2491   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.29%   87.29%           
=======================================
  Files         238      238           
  Lines       45378    45379    +1     
  Branches     4029     4029           
=======================================
+ Hits        39614    39615    +1     
  Misses       5083     5083           
  Partials      681      681           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

devito/types/dense.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@georgebisbas georgebisbas force-pushed the subdomains_vs_hardcoded_bcs branch from 46f3338 to 9656baf Compare November 25, 2024 10:47
@mloubout mloubout merged commit f54378d into master Nov 25, 2024
31 checks passed
@mloubout mloubout deleted the subdomains_vs_hardcoded_bcs branch November 25, 2024 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants