Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development #328

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

Development #328

merged 11 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

pauljamesdfe
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request overview

Give a general description of why a change is being made, include issue number(s) being fixed if relevant

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfils the following:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)
  • Tests have been run locally and are passing (run_tests_locally())
  • Code is styled according to tidyverse styling (checked locally with tidy_code())

What is the current behaviour?

Please describe the current behaviour that you are modifying, or link to a relevant issue. Include screenshots for UI changes where possible.

What is the new behaviour?

Please describe the behaviour or changes that are being added by this PR. Include screenshots for UI changes where possible.

Anything else

Add any notes for people reviewing and testing your code that are appropriate. Tag a @person to review if someone in particular needs to see this.

pauljamesdfe and others added 11 commits February 27, 2024 17:25
… shown for 16+ to show all employment – that’s the figure ONS and nomis tend to lead on. This may be to allign with other metrics - need to check that before changing

213	Employment volumes.  For the occupation and industry figures by LADU they all look odd.  I think his is because there must be suppressed figures in the volumes, then the percentages are calculated from the sum of the un-suppressed figures?  Example below – it means you only get 4-5 occupations and they are so much higher than anything else.  If I’ve got the reason wrong, the figures still look dubious.  If there’s not an easy fix we should just remove the LADU figures entirely.
119	Employment volumes are for 16-64 year olds.  This should really b…
@pauljamesdfe pauljamesdfe requested a review from Hanco20 March 22, 2024 10:55
Copy link
Contributor

@Hanco20 Hanco20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Paul

@Hanco20 Hanco20 merged commit b31da12 into main Mar 25, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants