-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ux): implement ux improvements #22
Conversation
🚀 Deployed on https://pr-22.route-manager.netlify.dhis2.org |
7bd4d5e
to
0ac79e1
Compare
157bc56
to
8dc1bfd
Compare
8dc1bfd
to
c301cc7
Compare
toggleRoute(route, !enabled) | ||
} | ||
checked={!route.disabled} | ||
label={i18n.t('Enable route')} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be an inline label in the row or would it be better as a column header?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cooper-joe I will leave the Switch label as it is now, but let me know if you think moving it to a column header is better as Austin mentions (it does seem a bit crowded now)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, I think we should move the Enable route
label into the column heading.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few minor comments but generally looks like good improvements
</ButtonStrip> | ||
</ModalActions> | ||
<ModalContent> | ||
<div className={classes.formContainer}> | ||
<InputField | ||
required |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think code is required? I might be wrong though...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah it seems to be required
c301cc7
to
ad47a03
Compare
🎉 This PR is included in version 100.3.3 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
This addresses few UX issues reported in the bugathon: