Submission 459, Langenegger/Schüpbach

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add submission 459 (https://github.com/Langca00/data-literacy-and-the-role-of-libraries)
• fix markdown formatting

Co-authored-by: Catrina Langenegger [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Johanna Schüpbach [email protected]

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new manuscript project configuration for Quarto, streamlining the publishing process.
  • Added a comprehensive submission on the role of libraries in enhancing data literacy within Digital Humanities.

• Documentation

  • Included detailed sections on educational formats for data literacy education, showcasing practical implementations and collaborations.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update introduces a YAML configuration file for a manuscript project using Quarto, alongside a comprehensive submission detailing libraries' roles in data literacy within Digital Humanities. The configuration establishes the document structure, specifying the main article file and the rendering format, while the manuscript elaborates on educational initiatives aimed at enhancing data literacy through collaboration between libraries and academia.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
submissions/459/_quarto.yml	Added a YAML configuration file for a manuscript project, defining project type, main article file, and rendering format.
submissions/459/index.qmd	Introduced a submission discussing libraries' roles in data literacy, including educational formats and collaborative methods.

Poem

In a world of data, hop and play,
Libraries guide us, come what may.
With tools and wisdom, knowledge grows,
Together we flourish, as everyone knows.
So here's to the scholars, both bright and keen,
In the garden of learning, we leap and we glean! 🐇📚

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aed60d0 and 844f8c9.

Files selected for processing (2)

• submissions/459/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
• submissions/459/index.qmd (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• submissions/459/_quarto.yml

Additional comments not posted (6)

submissions/459/index.qmd (6)

1-28: Metadata is well-structured and complete.

The metadata section is well-organized, and all necessary fields are present. The formatting and information appear to be correct.

---

30-34: Introduction is clear and well-written.

The introduction effectively sets the context for the manuscript and is free of grammatical errors.

---

35-40: Section on "Research Seminar/Semester Course" is detailed and informative.

The section provides a comprehensive overview of the course structure and outcomes. It is well-written and free of grammatical errors.

---

41-55: Section on "Data Literacy – a Session Within an Existing IDM Semester Course" is clear and well-structured.

The section clearly outlines the session's goals and challenges. It is well-written and free of grammatical errors.

---

56-60: Section on "Introduction to DH for a Research Seminar in English Literary Studies" is well-articulated.

The section effectively describes the session's content and objectives. It is clear and free of grammatical errors.

---

61-66: Conclusion is concise and effectively summarizes the manuscript.

The conclusion provides a clear summary of the manuscript's key points and is free of grammatical errors.