Submission 476, Matthey

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add poster 476 (see Add Poster Session to Book of Abstracts #48)

Co-Authored-By: Axel Matthey [email protected]

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a manuscript project configuration for structured document generation.
  • Added a comprehensive study on Large Language Models and historical modeling, focusing on economic inequalities.
  • Included a bibliography file for easy citation and retrieval of academic resources related to the project.

These enhancements improve document organization, facilitate research, and provide valuable resources for users in academic and professional settings.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve the introduction of three new files: _quarto.yml, index.qmd, and references.bib. The _quarto.yml file defines the manuscript project configuration, specifying the primary article and output format. The index.qmd file presents a study on Large Language Models and historical modeling, focusing on economic inequalities. The references.bib file contains a structured collection of bibliographic entries relevant to the research.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
submissions/poster/476/_quarto.yml	Introduced configuration for manuscript project, specifying project type, article, and output format.
submissions/poster/476/index.qmd	Added a comprehensive study on LLMs and historical modeling, focusing on economic inequalities.
submissions/poster/476/references.bib	Created a BibTeX file containing bibliographic entries for relevant academic references.

Poem

🐰 In fields of knowledge, bright and wide,
A manuscript blooms, with wisdom as its guide.
Diagrams dance, and references sing,
LLMs and history, a wondrous thing!
With every change, our insights grow,
A rabbit's joy in the learning flow! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b48645 and 736576d.

Files selected for processing (3)

• submissions/poster/476/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
• submissions/poster/476/index.qmd (1 hunks)
• submissions/poster/476/references.bib (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• submissions/poster/476/_quarto.yml
• submissions/poster/476/references.bib

Additional comments not posted (7)

submissions/poster/476/index.qmd (7)

1-22: Metadata section looks good.

The metadata is correctly formatted and complete.

---

17-22: Abstract section looks good.

The abstract is well-written and provides a comprehensive summary of the study.

---

24-26: Introduction section looks good.

The introduction is clear and sets the stage for the rest of the document.

---

28-32: Models in history section looks good.

The section is informative and provides a good background on the topic.

---

34-37: Manual causal modeling section looks good.

The section is detailed and explains the process clearly.

---

39-45: LLMs and automatic generation section looks good.

The section is comprehensive and outlines the potential of LLMs in this context.

---

48-54: Benefits and implications section looks good.

The section is well-structured and highlights the key benefits effectively.