Submission 484, Reisacher/Dubey

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add poster 484 (see Add Poster Session to Book of Abstracts #48)

Co-authored-by: Martin Reisacher [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Eric Dubey [email protected]

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a manuscript project configuration for streamlined rendering.
  • Added a submission for a poster session titled "Swiss Google Books for Research," detailing metadata and project insights.

• Documentation

  • Enhanced clarity on project organization and presentation format through new configuration settings.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve the introduction of a manuscript project configuration file _quarto.yml and a corresponding article file index.qmd. The configuration file outlines project settings, including the project type, main article file, and output format. The article file contains metadata for a poster session submission, detailing a collaborative project focused on digitizing historical texts and addressing research challenges.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
submissions/poster/484/_quarto.yml	Introduced configuration for manuscript project, specifying project type, main article, and output format.
submissions/poster/484/index.qmd	Added metadata for a poster session titled "Swiss Google Books for Research," including authors, categories, and project details.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Quarto
    participant Manuscript

    User->>Quarto: Initiates manuscript project
    Quarto->>Manuscript: Reads configuration from _quarto.yml
    Manuscript->>User: Prepares index.qmd for submission
    User->>Manuscript: Submits poster session details

Loading

🐇 In the meadow, I hop and play,
With changes bright, it’s a joyful day!
Manuscripts and projects, all in line,
A tale of books, oh how they shine!
Let’s gather 'round, share and cheer,
For knowledge grows when friends are near! 🌼📚

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b48645 and ff01a88.

Files selected for processing (2)

• submissions/poster/484/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
• submissions/poster/484/index.qmd (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• submissions/poster/484/_quarto.yml

Additional comments not posted (2)

submissions/poster/484/index.qmd (2)

1-17: Metadata section looks good.

The metadata is correctly formatted and includes all necessary information.

---

19-32: Content section looks good.

The content is well-structured, informative, and provides a comprehensive overview of the project.