Layout fixes #68
Layout fixes #68
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing documentation clarity and structure. Key changes involve the addition of references sections in various submissions, refinements in text clarity, and formatting adjustments. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip OpenAI O1 model for chat
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
submissions/460/index.qmd (2)
40-41: Insightful discussion on Transkribus usage.The added content provides valuable insights into the use of Transkribus for historical research and the author's experience with the platform. This enhances the understanding of the research process and the potential of AI-powered tools in this field.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what Transkribus is and how it works for readers who may not be familiar with the platform.
56-73: Insightful additions to the Publication, Visualisation, and Results sections.The changes in these sections provide valuable insights into the publication process, data visualization techniques, and the key findings of the study. The Publication section highlights the author's commitment to open access and avoiding research monopoly, while the Visualisation section offers a detailed description of the data transformation process using Gephi. The Results section effectively summarizes the main findings and their implications for understanding the glassworking community in post-medieval Estonia.
Consider adding a brief explanation of the FAIR principles mentioned in the Publication section for readers who may not be familiar with the concept.
submissions/428/index.qmd (1)
64-67: Reminder to add references before final submission.The references section is currently empty, with only a placeholder for the references. While this is not necessarily a problem at this stage of the writing process, please ensure that all references cited in the text are included in the references section before the final submission. This will help readers locate the sources mentioned in the paper and enhance the credibility of the work.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (39)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- styles.css (1 hunks)
- submissions/405/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/427/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/428/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/429/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/431/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/438/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/443/index.qmd (5 hunks)
- submissions/444/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/445/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/447/index.qmd (3 hunks)
- submissions/450/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/452/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/453/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/454/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/455/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/456/index.qmd (3 hunks)
- submissions/457/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/458/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/459/index.qmd (3 hunks)
- submissions/460/index.qmd (3 hunks)
- submissions/462/index.qmd (3 hunks)
- submissions/464/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/465/index.qmd (3 hunks)
- submissions/468/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/469/index.qmd (4 hunks)
- submissions/473/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/474/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/480/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/482/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/486/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/687/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/poster/440/index.qmd (2 hunks)
- submissions/poster/463/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/poster/466/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/poster/472/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/poster/476/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/poster/484/index.qmd (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (27)
- README.md
- submissions/405/index.qmd
- submissions/427/index.qmd
- submissions/438/index.qmd
- submissions/443/index.qmd
- submissions/445/index.qmd
- submissions/452/index.qmd
- submissions/453/index.qmd
- submissions/454/index.qmd
- submissions/455/index.qmd
- submissions/456/index.qmd
- submissions/457/index.qmd
- submissions/459/index.qmd
- submissions/462/index.qmd
- submissions/464/index.qmd
- submissions/468/index.qmd
- submissions/469/index.qmd
- submissions/473/index.qmd
- submissions/480/index.qmd
- submissions/482/index.qmd
- submissions/687/index.qmd
- submissions/poster/440/index.qmd
- submissions/poster/463/index.qmd
- submissions/poster/466/index.qmd
- submissions/poster/472/index.qmd
- submissions/poster/476/index.qmd
- submissions/poster/484/index.qmd
Additional comments not posted (42)
styles.css (4)
100-108: LGTM!The print media query is correctly implemented and the styles are appropriate for enhancing the print layout. Hiding unnecessary elements like navigation, search, and footer is a good practice to ensure a clean printed output.
111-114: LGTM!Setting the page size to A4 and defining consistent margins is important for a professional print layout. The chosen A4 size and 2cm margins are reasonable defaults.
117-123: LGTM!The page break rules are strategically implemented to maintain the structure and readability of the printed content. Avoiding page breaks within figures and after headings enhances the visual appeal and logical flow of the document.
Also applies to: 125-132
135-141: LGTM!The widow and orphan control for paragraphs and headings is a typographic best practice that enhances the readability of printed text. Explicitly setting the background color to white ensures a clean and consistent print output. The
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact;property is important for accurate reproduction of background colors and images in print.Also applies to: 144-148
submissions/486/index.qmd (1)
Line range hint
48-64: Excellent addition of the Methods, Conclusion, and References sections!The new content provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the project's objectives, methodologies, and challenges. The sections are well-structured and coherent, with a logical flow of information. The inclusion of the References section indicates that the document will cite relevant sources to support its arguments.
The changes align perfectly with the overall focus of the document on applying Named Entity Linking (NEL) to historical texts and the role of GLAM institutions in this process. The added content enhances the clarity and depth of the project's aims and methodologies.
Great work on improving the document's structure and content!
submissions/460/index.qmd (3)
26-26: Improved introduction.The expanded introduction provides a more comprehensive overview of the PhD project and highlights the significance of the genealogical data collected. This enhances the clarity and context of the research.
30-30: Enhanced data collection details.The additional details about the number of individuals, their origin, and the time period covered provide a clearer understanding of the dataset and its scope. This improves the overall clarity of the data collection section.
52-52: Valuable insights on OCR usage and user contributions.The added content highlights the use of OCR for digitized newspapers and the author's experience in correcting errors in the recognized text. This provides valuable insights into the research process and the importance of user input in enhancing the quality of digitized historical records.
submissions/444/index.qmd (4)
32-32: LGTM!The additional paragraph break improves the readability and structure of the introduction section.
36-36: Looks good!The additional paragraph and details about the CoCo Data Model and transformation pipeline enhance the comprehensiveness of the document, providing valuable insights into the project's technical aspects.
41-41: Great work on enhancing the document's structure!The additional paragraph breaks in the sections discussing the interdisciplinary team's work and the user testing of the portal significantly improve the readability and flow of the document. These changes make it easier for readers to follow the content and understand the key points being conveyed.
Also applies to: 49-50
62-66: Excellent addition of the references section!The inclusion of a dedicated references section at the end of the document is a great improvement. It formalizes the citations used throughout the text, enhances the credibility of the content, and provides readers with the opportunity to explore the cited sources further. This addition aligns with academic best practices and strengthens the overall quality of the document.
submissions/458/index.qmd (6)
42-42: LGTM!The added point provides valuable context about the sentence-level analysis, which is a key innovation of this work. It helps the reader understand how this approach enables richer contextual understanding compared to analyzing individual words.
44-45: The streamlined biography reads well.The changes to Chen Duxiu's biography have improved the readability of this section. The essential historical context is maintained while the narrative flow is more coherent. Nice work!
47-47: The added paragraph effectively sets up the main research question.The new paragraph does a great job of setting up the main research question that the paper aims to answer. It provides valuable context about Chen's early optimism and the challenges he faced later in life, which may have influenced his views. By ending with a direction to analyze Chen's essays, it nicely leads the reader into the main content of the paper.
51-63: The expanded methodology section greatly improves clarity and reproducibility.The changes to the methodology section have significantly improved its clarity and detail. The specific tools and libraries used for each step of the analysis are now clearly described. The preprocessing and tokenization steps, especially the custom Chinese sentence detection function, are well-clarified. The enhanced embedding and similarity analysis section provides a better understanding of how the language model is utilized.
These changes make the methodology much easier to understand and reproduce. Great improvements!
Line range hint
67-91: The new subsections on using GPT-4 provide valuable methodological details.The added subsections "Question Design", "API Request", and "Response Extraction" are excellent additions to the methodology. They provide important details on the specific steps involved in using the GPT-4 model for the analysis.
The "Question Design" subsection clearly states the question used to extract political sentences, which helps the reader understand the focus of the analysis. The "API Request" subsection provides valuable insight into how the model is prompted and guided to perform the task. The "Response Extraction" subsection clarifies how the model's output is processed to obtain the final results.
These additions make the methodology more complete, transparent, and easier to understand. Great work on enhancing this section!
96-128: The elaborated results and refined conclusion provide a nuanced and insightful analysis.The changes to the results and conclusion sections have greatly enhanced the depth and quality of the analysis and discussion. The detailed critique of the Llama and ChatGPT outputs, supported by specific examples, provides valuable insights into their performance and limitations. The examples illustrating ChatGPT's challenges in handling nuanced texts with multiple viewpoints are particularly illuminating.
The refined conclusion effectively summarizes the key findings and implications, highlighting the complexity of Chen's thought and the need for further methodological refinements. The added paragraph on Chen's ideological evolution demonstrates the potential of this approach to generate new historical insights.
The addition of the references section enhances the scholarly rigor of the paper.
Overall, these changes result in a more balanced, nuanced, and insightful analysis. They significantly strengthen the paper's contribution to the field. Excellent work!
submissions/428/index.qmd (8)
13-25: The abstract provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the project.The abstract is well-structured and effectively communicates the project's objectives, challenges, and the context of the data being analyzed. It highlights the key aspects such as the use of TEI guidelines for digitizing historical statistical tables, the challenges faced during OCR digitization, and the potential of TEI in improving text recognition for tables.
25-31: The introduction effectively sets the context for the project.The introduction does a great job of connecting contemporary data challenges to historical data preservation. It emphasizes the importance of sustainable data archiving practices and the potential of structured formats like TEI for ensuring future accessibility of data. The narrative flow is engaging and sets the stage for the rest of the paper.
31-36: The data description section provides a clear and detailed explanation of the example data set.The data description section effectively communicates the details of the example data set used in the project. It includes relevant information about the source of the data (monthly reports of the Zurich Statistical Office), the digitization process (high-resolution pdfs with OCR by the Central Library's Digitisation Centre), and the specific table selected for the study (Table 12 for January 1914). This level of detail helps the reader understand the context and scope of the project.
36-42: The methods section provides an honest overview of the challenges and limitations of using TEI for historical tables.The methods section effectively communicates the inspiration for the project and the use of TEI guidelines for preparing tables. It candidly discusses the cautious approach of TEI guidelines regarding table formats and the reserved responses from the TEI community about using TEI for historical tables. This helps set realistic expectations for the reader about the challenges and limitations of using TEI for this purpose. The inclusion of relevant references and links to the TEI mailing list discussion adds credibility to the discussion.
42-48: The table structure section provides a detailed explanation of the practical application of TEI guidelines to the example data set.The table structure section effectively communicates how the example table was manually transcribed and annotated using TEI-XML. It includes specific details about the TEI elements and attributes used to structure the table data, such as the use of "head" elements for metadata, "label" attributes for column and row headers, and "ana" attributes for marking sums and totals. This level of detail helps the reader understand the practical application of TEI guidelines to the example data set and the thought process behind the annotation choices. The inclusion of the code snippet length (550 lines) also gives the reader a sense of the complexity involved in the process.
48-54: The challenges and problems section provides an honest and detailed account of the issues faced during the project.The challenges and problems section effectively communicates the various issues encountered during the OCR-based digitization process and the limitations of TEI for table preparation. It candidly discusses the failure of the OCR software to capture the text in the tables, the potential for errors when manually transcribing and transferring data into XML, and the fundamental limitations of TEI being more geared towards continuous text rather than tabular data. The section also highlights the complexity of TEI and the time-consuming nature of converting the sample table into XML and preparing an associated TEI schema. This honest discussion of the challenges faced adds credibility to the project and helps the reader understand the practical limitations of using TEI for historical tables. It provides valuable insights for anyone considering a similar project in the future.
54-57: The ideas for project expansion section provides valuable suggestions for improving the project and addressing some of the challenges faced.The ideas for project expansion section demonstrates a thoughtful consideration of the project's limitations and potential future directions. It emphasizes the importance of achieving high-quality OCR for table recognition and suggests using the TEI elements as training data for improving the performance of text recognition programs. This is a valuable insight that could significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of the digitization process in future projects. The section also recommends integrating additional TEI elements such as locations and gender to enhance the richness of the XML format, which would make the data more useful for analysis. Finally, it highlights the importance of understanding and implementing XSLT for automated structuring and as a basis for RDF, which is crucial for scaling the project to larger datasets. These suggestions provide a clear roadmap for future work and demonstrate the author's deep understanding of the project's potential and limitations.
60-63: The conclusion section effectively summarizes the key points of the project and provides a clear takeaway message.The conclusion section does an excellent job of tying together the various threads of the project and leaving the reader with a clear understanding of the project's significance and potential impact. It acknowledges the challenges of using TEI for tables, as evidenced by the "shadowy existence" of tables within TEI and the quote from Lou Burnard about tables being "tricky". However, it also highlights the potential benefits of using TEI, such as the opportunity to think conceptually about the function of tabular data, the potential for improving text recognition for tables, and the importance of platform-independent, non-proprietary data structures like XML for long-term archiving of digital data. The final sentence about ensuring access to historical statistics for future generations during the next pandemic is a powerful and timely message that underscores the relevance and importance of the project. Overall, the conclusion is well-written and provides a satisfying end to the paper.
submissions/429/index.qmd (1)
77-81: Great job adding a references section!The addition of a references section using Pandoc's bibliography syntax and a separate
references.bibfile is a good practice for academic writing. It enhances the credibility of the document and allows for easy management of references.submissions/447/index.qmd (1)
Line range hint
98-133: Great additions to enhance the document's clarity and comprehensiveness!The new content provides valuable insights into the challenges addressed by Geovistory, its modular system for managing complex HSS information, and its integration with the DH ecosystem. The conclusions and future perspectives section effectively summarizes the key points and highlights the importance of collaboration and partnerships for the sustainability of the ecosystem.
The addition of the "References" section is a notable improvement that enhances the academic rigor of the document by providing a structured approach to citing sources.
Overall, these changes make the document more informative and comprehensive, effectively communicating the functionalities and objectives of Geovistory.
submissions/450/index.qmd (6)
29-29: LGTM!The change enhances the clarity of the text.
32-34: LGTM!The changes improve the clarity and coherence of the text while preserving the core discussion about GIS as a layered data system and the importance of data curation.
37-40: LGTM!The changes enhance the clarity of the figure captions.
50-56: LGTM!The changes improve the clarity and focus of the text while preserving the core arguments about the opportunities presented by GIS and the importance of critical engagement with sources.
59-71: LGTM!The changes enhance the clarity of the figure captions.
79-89: LGTM!The changes improve the clarity and coherence of the text while preserving the core arguments about the potential biases in GIS mapping and the importance of transparency and critical thinking. The addition of the "References" section enhances the document's structure.
submissions/465/index.qmd (4)
29-29: Great introduction!The expanded introduction effectively sets the context for the discussion by highlighting the growing role of Machine Learning in the humanities and the challenges that arise from integrating machine-generated data in historical research. It provides a clear and concise overview of the topic, making it easier for readers to understand the significance of the issue.
35-35: Insightful discussion on data reliability.The enriched "Facticity" section provides a nuanced discussion on the reliability of both machine-generated and human-generated data. By drawing parallels between the two and highlighting the pragmatic approach taken in historical research, the section effectively sets the stage for the challenges of integrating machine-generated data. The discussion on the acceptance of errors due to expert oversight is particularly insightful and adds depth to the argument.
45-45: Comprehensive discussion on evaluating ML outputs.The elaborated "Qualifying Error Rates" section provides a thorough discussion on the complexities of evaluating ML outputs, particularly in HTR. The introduction of the CERberus tool and its capabilities is informative and highlights the importance of going beyond simple metrics. The section effectively underscores the need for qualitative error analysis and advocates for the extension of source criticism to digital datasets. This discussion is crucial for historians to understand the challenges and the need to expand their traditional methods.
55-79: Well-structured and insightful discussion on strategic directions.The "Three Strategic Directions" section provides a comprehensive and well-structured discussion on the strategies for advancing digital history. Each direction is discussed in detail, with practical suggestions for implementation. The emphasis on defining clear needs for data and enhancing transparency in data publication is crucial for improving data interoperability and reusability. The introduction of the concept of data hermeneutics and the call for critical reflection on methods used to generate digital data is insightful and highlights the need for historians to adapt their methods to the digital age. This section effectively ties together the challenges discussed in the previous sections and provides a roadmap for addressing them.
submissions/431/index.qmd (1)
139-142: Great addition of the References section!The new References section provides a dedicated space to list the citations used in the document, following academic writing best practices.
submissions/474/index.qmd (3)
47-47: Great addition!The new section "System and Environment: Contextualizing digital objects" provides valuable insights into the interdependencies of digital objects with their technical environments. It reinforces the importance of understanding file formats, applications, and operating systems when engaging with digital artifacts from a critical perspective. This addition enhances the overall discussion and aligns well with the theme of digital literacy.
59-59: Excellent expansion!The expanded section "Contextualization and Critique" effectively reinforces the critical role of historians in interpreting digital artifacts. It emphasizes the importance of extending the analysis beyond technical systems to include the broader cultural, economic, and social structures. This addition strengthens the argument that historians must engage in a comprehensive critique when working with digital objects, aligning with the overall theme of the document.
66-69: Excellent addition of the References section!The inclusion of a dedicated "References" section at the end of the document is a great practice. It provides a clear and structured way to list all the cited sources, enhancing the credibility and academic rigor of the document. This addition aligns with standard academic writing conventions and improves the overall organization of the document.
Pull request
Proposed changes
Types of changes
Checklist
Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation