Submission 471, Profeta et al. #76
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Giovanni Profeta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Fabio Rinaldi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joseph Cornelius <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Regina Wanger <[email protected]>
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces new files and configurations for the project "AI-assisted Search for Digitized Publication Archives." It adds a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
submissions/471/references.bib (4)
17-34: LGTM: Comprehensive book chapter entry with a minor suggestion.The
dani_digital_2015entry is well-formed with all necessary fields for a book chapter. The inclusion of series information and ISBN enhances its usefulness.Consider removing the non-standard
copyrightfield or replacing it with a note in thenotefield if the copyright information is crucial.
79-94: LGTM: Well-structured article entry with a note on the editor field.The
merono-penuela_semantic_2014entry is complete with all necessary fields for an article. The inclusion of DOI and URL enhances accessibility.The
editorfield is unusual for an article entry. While not incorrect, you might want to double-check if this information is necessary or if it belongs in a different field (e.g.,note).
96-110: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider reformatting the author field.The
vora_n00b_2010entry is comprehensive and well-structured, providing multiple identifiers (ISBN, DOI, URL) for easy access.The author field includes "Stanton Usability Team" in a non-standard format. Consider reformatting it to ensure compatibility with various citation styles. You could either:
- List individual team members if known:
author = {Vora, Parul and Komura, Naoko and Smith, John and Doe, Jane},
- Or use the team name as an organization author:
author = {Vora, Parul and Komura, Naoko and {Stanton Usability Team}},The second option preserves the team name while following BibTeX conventions for organization names.
112-120: LGTM with suggestions for additional information.The
whitelaw_generous_2015entry contains the required fields for an article and provides a URL for access.Consider enhancing the entry with additional details if available:
- Add the
pagesfield with the article's page range.- Include the
monthof publication if known.- If applicable, add a
doifield with the article's DOI for improved discoverability.Example:
@article{whitelaw_generous_2015, % ... existing fields ... pages = {1--15}, % Replace with actual page range month = jan, % Replace with actual month doi = {10.xxxx/xxxxx}, % Replace with actual DOI if available }These additions would make the entry more complete and align it with the level of detail provided in other entries.
submissions/471/index.qmd (3)
83-83: Clarify the sentence about LLM constraintsThe sentence could be rephrased for better clarity regarding the constraints encountered.
Consider rephrasing as:
"Throughout this preliminary project, we encountered some constraints, including the limited prompt size of LLM algorithms, which is insufficient for processing very long documents, and the low quality of the summaries generated by the algorithms, despite historians requiring high accuracy."
73-73: Update the GPT-4 model referenceThe model "gpt-4-0125-preview" might be outdated. Ensure you are referencing the current version of GPT-4.
Consider updating the model reference if applicable.
82-82: Use 'thus' instead of 'and so' for better flowIn the sentence, "and so fostering the comparison" can be replaced with "thus fostering the comparison" for improved readability.
Apply this diff to improve the sentence:
- and so fostering the comparison of different authors' perspectives + thus fostering the comparison of different authors' perspectives
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
submissions/471/images/mini-muse-information-system.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- submissions/471/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- submissions/471/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
- submissions/471/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/471/references.bib (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- submissions/471/.gitignore
- submissions/471/_quarto.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
submissions/471/references.bib (3)
1-15: LGTM: Well-formed and comprehensive bibliographic entry.The
comeau_bioc_2013entry is complete with all necessary fields for an article. The inclusion of DOI, URL, and language fields enhances accessibility and clarity.
45-59: LGTM: Comprehensive and well-structured article entry.The
during_transparent_2024entry is complete with all necessary fields for an article. The inclusion of DOI, URL, and language fields enhances accessibility and clarity. The detailed journal title is correctly provided.
1-120: Overall: High-quality bibliography with minor suggestions for improvement.This
references.bibfile contains 8 well-structured bibliographic entries covering relevant topics in digital humanities and cultural heritage. The entries generally provide comprehensive information, including DOIs and URLs for easy access to the original sources.Summary of suggestions:
- Add the missing
booktitlefield to thede_gunther_tracing_2023entry.- Correct the year discrepancy in the
ehrmann_named_2023entry's citation key.- Consider reformatting the author field in the
vora_n00b_2010entry.- Add additional details (pages, month, DOI) to the
whitelaw_generous_2015entry if available.Addressing these minor points will further enhance the quality and consistency of the bibliography.
submissions/471/index.qmd (1)
45-84: Overall content is well-structured and informativeThe document provides a comprehensive overview of the project with clear sections and detailed explanations. The inclusion of figures and references enhances the understanding of the work.
Co-Authored-By: Giovanni Profeta <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
submissions/471/references.bib (2)
36-45: Consider adding publisher and DOI/URL for improved accessibility.The
de_gunther_tracing_2023entry is well-structured and includes a valuable abstract. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add the publisher of the conference proceedings.
- If available, include a DOI or URL for easier access to the publication.
Example:
publisher = {Name of Publisher}, doi = {10.xxxx/xxxxx}, url = {https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxxx},
114-122: Consider adding more details to enhance the bibliographic entry.The
whitelaw_generous_2015entry provides basic information but could be improved with additional details:
- Add the page range if available.
- Include a DOI if one exists for this publication.
- Consider adding the following fields if the information is available:
- month of publication
- ISSN of the journal
- language of the article
Example additions:
pages = {start--end}, doi = {10.xxxx/xxxxx}, month = {month}, issn = {xxxx-xxxx}, language = {en},These additions would make the entry more complete and easier to reference.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- submissions/471/references.bib (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
submissions/471/references.bib (6)
1-15: LGTM: Well-formatted and complete bibliographic entry.The
comeau_bioc_2013entry is comprehensive and correctly formatted. It includes all necessary fields for an article entry, along with additional useful information such as the DOI and URL for easy access.
17-34: LGTM: Comprehensive and well-structured bibliographic entry.The
dani_digital_2015entry is thorough and correctly formatted. It includes all necessary fields for an incollection entry, along with additional useful information such as the DOI, URL, and series details.
47-61: LGTM: Well-formatted and complete bibliographic entry.The
during_transparent_2024entry is comprehensive and correctly formatted. It includes all necessary fields for an article entry, along with additional useful information such as the DOI and URL for easy access.
81-96: LGTM: Comprehensive and well-structured bibliographic entry.The
merono-penuela_semantic_2014entry is thorough and correctly formatted. It includes all necessary fields for an article entry, along with additional useful information such as the DOI, URL, and editor details.
98-112: LGTM: Well-formatted and complete bibliographic entry.The
vora_n00b_2010entry is comprehensive and correctly formatted. It includes all necessary fields for an inproceedings entry, along with additional useful information such as the DOI and URL for easy access. The group author is also correctly formatted.
63-79:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate citation key to match publication year.
The
ehrmann_named_2023entry is comprehensive and well-structured. However, there's a discrepancy between the year in the citation key (2023) and the actual publication year (2024).Please update the citation key to match the publication year:
@article{ehrmann_named_2024, % ... rest of the entry remains the same }This will ensure consistency and prevent potential confusion when citing this article.
Pull request
Proposed changes
Co-authored-by: Giovanni Profeta [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Fabio Rinaldi [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Joseph Cornelius [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Regina Wanger [email protected]
Types of changes
Checklist
Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
index.qmdfile.references.bib.Chores
.gitignoreto exclude the.quarto/directory._quarto.ymlconfiguration file for project settings.