Database action fix. #1111
Database action fix. #1111
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates include a structural change in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit's AI:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- kairon/actions/definitions/database.py (2 hunks)
- tests/integration_test/action_service_test.py (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
kairon/actions/definitions/database.py (1)
- 74-74: Ensure that the database instance creation with the new
collection_nameis tested thoroughly, as this change affects how the database is accessed.tests/integration_test/action_service_test.py (4)
- 2902-2902: Ensure that the updated HTTP URL in the test reflects the new
collection_namewith thesuffixas intended by the changes indatabase.py. If thesuffixis dynamic, consider parameterizing the URL construction in the tests.Verification successful
The updated HTTP URL in the
action_service_test.pyfile reflects the newcollection_namewith thesuffixas intended by the changes indatabase.py. The pattern found indatabase.pyshows that thecollection_nameis constructed using a format that includesself.bot, thecollectionfromvector_action_config, andself.suffix. This matches the structure observed in the updated HTTP URL in the integration test.* 2987-2987: Check that the updated HTTP URL is consistent with the intended changes, especially the `suffix` in the `collection_name`. If the `suffix` is meant to be dynamic, the test should reflect that.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated URL is consistent with the changes in database.py rg --type python 'collection_name.*suffix' src/kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of 'collection_name' with 'suffix' in database.py without specifying file type rg 'collection_name.*suffix' src/kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the 'database.py' file within the repository fd 'database.py'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of 'collection_name' with 'suffix' in the correct file path rg 'collection_name.*suffix' kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 163
Verification successful
The search within
database.pyhas found a line wherecollection_nameis constructed with asuffix. This matches the pattern of the updated HTTP URL in theaction_service_test.pyfile, where the URL contains what appears to be a suffix appended to the collection name.Based on the output, the
collection_nameis formatted withself.bot,vector_action_config['collection'], andself.suffix. This suggests that thesuffixis indeed intended to be dynamic and part of the collection name, which aligns with the updated HTTP URL in the test file.The review comment is verified to be consistent with the codebase changes.
* 3126-3126: Confirm that the updated HTTP URL correctly includes the `suffix` to the `collection_name` as per the changes in `database.py`. If the `suffix` is not static, the test should be designed to accommodate the dynamic nature of the URL.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated URL is consistent with the changes in database.py rg --type python 'collection_name.*suffix' src/kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated URL is consistent with the changes in database.py rg 'collection_name.*suffix' src/kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the database.py file within the kairon/actions/definitions directory fd 'database.py' 'src/kairon/actions/definitions'Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the database.py file in the entire repository fd 'database.py'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated URL is consistent with the changes in database.py rg 'collection_name.*suffix' kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 163
Verification successful
The updated HTTP URL in
action_service_test.pyis consistent with the changes indatabase.py. Thecollection_nameis constructed by appending thesuffixdirectly to the name, as seen in the provided output fromdatabase.py. The URL in the test file reflects this pattern, indicating that thesuffixis correctly included.* 3211-3211: Verify that the updated HTTP URL correctly appends the `suffix` to the `collection_name`. If the `suffix` is variable, the test should dynamically construct the URL to match the expected behavior.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated URL is consistent with the changes in database.py rg --type python 'collection_name.*suffix' src/kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated URL is consistent with the changes in database.py rg 'collection_name.*suffix' kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 163
Verification successful
I will now generate a new script to search for the usage of
collection_nameandsuffixwithin thedatabase.pyfile without specifying the file type, as it seems to have caused an issue in the previous attempt.
The script has successfully found a line in
database.pythat constructs thecollection_nameusing a format string that includesself.bot,vector_action_config['collection'], andself.suffix. This confirms that thesuffixis indeed appended to thecollection_namewithin thedatabase.pyfile.Given this information, the updated HTTP URL in the
action_service_test.pyfile should reflect this pattern. The URL provided in the review comment includes a suffix (_test_vectordb_action_execution_no_response_dispatch_faq_embd) appended to the collection name, which is consistent with the pattern found indatabase.py.Based on the output, the review comment is verified, and the updated HTTP URL correctly appends the
suffixto thecollection_name.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the updated URL is consistent with the changes in database.py rg --type python 'collection_name.*suffix' src/kairon/actions/definitions/database.pyLength of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of 'collection_name' and 'suffix' in 'database.py' rg 'collection_name.*suffix' $(fd database.py)Length of output: 181
| @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ def __init__(self, bot: Text, name: Text): | |||
| """ | |||
| self.bot = bot | |||
| self.name = name | |||
| self.suffix = "_faq_embd" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The suffix attribute has been hardcoded to "_faq_embd". Consider making this configurable to support different environments or use cases.
- self.suffix = "_faq_embd"
+ self.suffix = suffixCommittable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| self.suffix = "_faq_embd" | |
| self.suffix = suffix |
| @@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ | |||
| vector_action_config = self.retrieve_config() | |||
| dispatch_bot_response = vector_action_config['response']['dispatch'] | |||
| failure_response = vector_action_config['failure_response'] | |||
| collection_name = vector_action_config['collection'] | |||
| collection_name = f"{self.bot}_{vector_action_config['collection']}{self.suffix}" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Utility.check_empty_string method only checks for empty or whitespace-only strings. There is no additional validation to ensure the collection value conforms to database naming conventions or does not end with a special character. Therefore, the review comment's concern about the potential lack of sanitization of the collection value before appending the suffix is valid based on the current information available.
Analysis chain
Appending the suffix directly to the collection_name could lead to issues if the collection value from vector_action_config ends with a special character or does not conform to collection naming conventions. Validate that the collection value is sanitized before appending the suffix.
To verify if the collection values are sanitized before appending the suffix, we need to examine the code surrounding the f-string assignments in the files mentioned in the output. Let's start with kairon/actions/definitions/database.py since that's the primary file of interest in the PR.
The regex pattern used in the rg commands contained unescaped curly braces, which caused a parse error. Let's correct the pattern and re-run the commands to examine the code surrounding the f-string assignments.
The provided context does not show any sanitization or validation of the collection value before appending the suffix. To further investigate, we need to look at the retrieve_config method to see if it ensures that the collection value is sanitized.
The retrieve_config method does not include sanitization of the collection value. We need to investigate the DatabaseAction model to see if it contains any validation or sanitization logic for the collection values.
The DatabaseAction model definition was not found in the database.py file. We will expand the search to the entire codebase to locate the model definition and check for any validation or sanitization logic.
The DatabaseAction model does not appear to sanitize the collection field beyond checking for non-empty values. The validate_collection_name method in DatabaseActionRequest checks for an empty string, but this may not be sufficient to address the review comment's concerns. We need to investigate the Utility.check_empty_string method for any additional validation logic.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the collection names are sanitized before appending the suffix.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'f"{$_}_{$_}{$_}"'
Length of output: 540
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the code surrounding the f-string assignment for collection_name in database.py
rg --context 5 'collection_name = f"{self.bot}_' ./kairon/actions/definitions/database.py
Length of output: 226
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the code surrounding the f-string assignment for collection_name in gpt3.py
rg --context 5 'collection = f"{self.bot}_' ./kairon/shared/llm/gpt3.py
Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Correct the regex pattern by escaping curly braces and re-run the command for database.py
rg --context 5 'collection_name = f"\{self.bot\}_' ./kairon/actions/definitions/database.py
Length of output: 744
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Correct the regex pattern by escaping curly braces and re-run the command for gpt3.py
rg --context 5 'collection = f"\{self.bot\}_' ./kairon/shared/llm/gpt3.py
Length of output: 937
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of the retrieve_config method to understand how it provides the collection value.
rg "def retrieve_config" -A 10 ./kairon/actions/definitions/database.py
Length of output: 602
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the DatabaseAction model definition to check for validation or sanitization logic.
rg "class DatabaseAction" -A 20 ./kairon/actions/definitions/database.py
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the DatabaseAction model definition across the entire codebase.
rg "class DatabaseAction" -A 20
Length of output: 2989
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the Utility.check_empty_string method to understand its validation logic.
rg "def check_empty_string" -A 10 ./kairon/shared/utils.py
Length of output: 317
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests