Manage Callback Access

[maheshsattala]

added access for the manage callbacks as well in roles.yml

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a new permission category, manageCallbacks, allowing specified roles (owner, admin, designer, tester, and view) to manage callbacks with full access.
• Bug Fixes
  • Corrected indentation for existing permissions to improve readability and structure in the role configuration.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new permission category called manageCallbacks in the metadata/roles.yml file. This permission is enabled for the roles of owner, admin, designer, and tester, allowing them to perform various actions related to callbacks. In contrast, the agent role has all permissions under manageCallbacks set to false, restricting its access. Additionally, some existing permissions have been reformatted for improved readability.

Changes

File	Change Summary
metadata/roles.yml	Added new permission manageCallbacks with specific settings for roles: owner, admin, designer, tester, and view. Corrected indentation for existing permissions like logs and generateStories.

Poem

In the meadow, roles take flight,
With manageCallbacks, all feels right.
Owners and admins, with power anew,
Designers and testers, what fun they can do!
But agents must wait, their turn will come,
In the world of permissions, we all hum. 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between edf1943 and 1814f2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• metadata/roles.yml (12 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (7)

metadata/roles.yml (7)

21-21: LGTM: 'owner' role permissions for manageCallbacks

The new manageCallbacks permission has been correctly added to the 'owner' role with full access to all actions (add, edit, delete, augment, download). This is consistent with the high-level permissions typically granted to an owner.

Also applies to: 108-113

---

142-142: LGTM: 'admin' role permissions for manageCallbacks

The new manageCallbacks permission has been correctly added to the 'admin' role with full access to all actions (add, edit, delete, augment, download). This is consistent with the high-level permissions typically granted to an admin, matching the access level of the owner role for this feature.

Also applies to: 229-234

---

263-263: Consider reviewing 'designer' role permissions for manageCallbacks

The new manageCallbacks permission has been added to the 'designer' role with full access to all actions (add, edit, delete, augment, download). While this may be intentional, it's worth considering if designers require full access, especially for actions like 'delete'. Consider reviewing these permissions to ensure they align with the intended responsibilities of the designer role.

Also applies to: 350-355

---

384-384: LGTM: 'tester' role permissions for manageCallbacks

The new manageCallbacks permission has been correctly added to the 'tester' role with all actions set to false. This restriction is appropriate for the tester role, which typically doesn't need access to manage callbacks.

Also applies to: 471-476

---

505-505: LGTM: 'agent' role permissions for manageCallbacks

The new manageCallbacks permission has been correctly added to the 'agent' role with all actions set to false. This restriction is appropriate for the agent role, which typically doesn't need access to manage callbacks.

Also applies to: 592-597

---

628-628: LGTM: 'view' role permissions for manageCallbacks

The new manageCallbacks permission has been correctly added to the 'view' role with all actions set to false. This restriction is appropriate for the view role, which is typically a read-only role without access to manage or modify any features.

Also applies to: 715-720

---

21-21: Overall review: manageCallbacks permissions added consistently

The new manageCallbacks permission has been added consistently to all roles in the YAML file. The access levels are appropriate for most roles:

• 'owner' and 'admin' have full access
• 'tester', 'agent', and 'view' roles have all actions set to false

However, the 'designer' role has been granted full access to all manageCallbacks actions, which may need further review to ensure it aligns with the intended responsibilities of this role.

Please confirm if the full access granted to the 'designer' role for manageCallbacks is intentional and aligns with your security policies.

Also applies to: 108-113, 142-142, 229-234, 263-263, 350-355, 384-384, 471-476, 505-505, 592-597, 628-628, 715-720

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[hiteshghuge]

approved