Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added llm classifier #1613

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

added llm classifier #1613

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

sfahad1414
Copy link
Collaborator

@sfahad1414 sfahad1414 commented Dec 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced LLMClassifier for improved intent and entity classification.
    • Added methods for enhanced HTTP request handling, including trigger_rephrase for rephrasing text responses.
    • Added enable_onboarding feature for improved user onboarding processes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and logging in various methods related to HTTP interactions.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies in the production requirements, including the addition of more-itertools and re-inclusion of huggingface-hub.
    • Removed outdated components from configuration files to streamline the application structure.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve multiple updates across several files in the Kairon project. Key modifications include the introduction of the LLMClassifier in kairon/nlu/__init__.py, significant refactoring of the LLMClassifier class in kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py, enhancements to the ActionUtility class in kairon/shared/actions/utils.py, and the removal of the OpenAIFeaturizer class in kairon/shared/nlu/featurizer/openai.py. Additionally, the requirements/prod.txt file was modified to include new dependencies and reorganize existing ones, while the system.yaml and tests/testing_data/system.yaml files were updated to reflect changes in core components and configuration parameters.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
kairon/nlu/__init__.py Added import statement for LLMClassifier from classifiers.llm.
kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py Introduced LLMClassifier class with methods for training, predicting, and processing messages. Updated method signatures and added error handling for API key retrieval.
kairon/shared/actions/utils.py Enhanced ActionUtility class with new methods like trigger_rephrase and improved error handling for HTTP requests and external service integrations.
kairon/shared/nlu/featurizer/openai.py Removed OpenAIFeaturizer class, eliminating functionality related to OpenAI's language model integration for feature extraction.
requirements/prod.txt Added more-itertools, re-added huggingface-hub==0.25.2, no other version changes.
system.yaml Updated core.components to replace OpenAI classifier with kairon.nlu.LLMClassifier, added enable_onboarding parameter.
tests/testing_data/system.yaml Updated core.components to replace OpenAI classifier with kairon.nlu.LLMClassifier, added new parameters in llm and verify sections, included enable_onboarding in properties.bot.

Possibly related PRs

  • Litellm #1265: The changes in this PR involve the introduction of the litellm library, which is directly related to the LLMClassifier being imported in the main PR. Both PRs focus on enhancing the functionality of language model classifiers.
  • Separated llm_metadata from system_metadata and added API to fetch the same #1421: This PR separates llm_metadata from system_metadata and introduces an API to fetch it, which aligns with the changes in the main PR that involve the LLMClassifier. Both PRs are concerned with improving the handling and accessibility of language model-related metadata.
  • code fixed #1491: This PR includes modifications in the kairon/shared/llm/processor.py file, which is relevant to the LLMClassifier and its functionality. The changes enhance how embeddings are retrieved based on the specified LLM type, which is pertinent to the classifier's operation.

Suggested reviewers

  • hiteshghuge

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
New classifiers chase away the gloom.
With batches processed, swift and bright,
Our code now dances, pure delight!
Dependencies added, all in line,
Hooray for progress, oh so fine! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py (4)

18-18: Remove unused import batch

The import of batch from tensorflow.python.ops.gen_batch_ops is not used in the code.

Apply this diff to remove the unused import:

-from tensorflow.python.ops.gen_batch_ops import batch
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

18-18: tensorflow.python.ops.gen_batch_ops.batch imported but unused

Remove unused import: tensorflow.python.ops.gen_batch_ops.batch

(F401)


102-102: Remove unnecessary f prefix in string

The f-string at line 102 has no placeholders, so the f prefix is unnecessary.

Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary f prefix:

-                    f"either set bot_id'in LLMClassifier config or set LLM_API_KEY in environment variables"
+                    "either set bot_id'in LLMClassifier config or set LLM_API_KEY in environment variables"
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

102-102: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)


171-171: Simplify key existence checks in dictionaries

Instead of using "key" in dict.keys(), use "key" in dict when checking for the existence of keys in a dictionary.

Apply this diff to simplify the key checks:

-                intent = responses["intent"] if "intent" in responses.keys() else None
+                intent = responses["intent"] if "intent" in responses else None

...

-                    responses["explanation"]
-                    if "explanation" in responses.keys()
+                    responses["explanation"]
+                    if "explanation" in responses

Also applies to: 174-174

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

171-171: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


178-178: Include exception traceback in logs to aid debugging

Including the exception traceback in the logs will help with debugging.

Apply this diff to include the traceback in the log:

-                logger.error(e)
+                logger.error(e, exc_info=True)
kairon/shared/nlu/featurizer/openai.py (2)

Line range hint 44-49: Consider using LLM_API_KEY environment variable for consistency

Currently, the code uses OPENAI_API_KEY as the environment variable for the API key. For consistency with LLMClassifier and to simplify configuration, consider changing it to LLM_API_KEY.

Apply this diff to update the environment variable:

         elif os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY"):
-            self.api_key = os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY")
+            self.api_key = os.environ.get("LLM_API_KEY")
         else:
             raise KeyError(
-                f"either set bot_id'in OpenAIFeaturizer config or set OPENAI_API_KEY in environment variables"
+                "either set bot_id'in OpenAIFeaturizer config or set LLM_API_KEY in environment variables"
             )

202-212: Consider processing messages in batches for improved performance

In the process method, messages are processed individually in a loop. To improve performance, especially for larger batches, consider processing messages in batches by modifying the method to handle multiple messages at once.

kairon/nlu/__init__.py (1)

1-1: Add LLMClassifier to __all__ to make it an explicit export

The LLMClassifier is imported but not declared as a public API component. To clarify the intended public API and avoid linter warnings, consider adding LLMClassifier to the __all__ list.

Apply this diff to add __all__ and include LLMClassifier:

+__all__ = ["LLMClassifier"]

 from .classifiers.llm import LLMClassifier
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

1-1: .classifiers.llm.LLMClassifier imported but unused; consider removing, adding to __all__, or using a redundant alias

(F401)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d1d50e and 5daf69f.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • kairon/nlu/__init__.py (1 hunks)
  • kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py (8 hunks)
  • kairon/shared/actions/utils.py (0 hunks)
  • kairon/shared/nlu/featurizer/openai.py (2 hunks)
  • requirements/prod.txt (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • kairon/shared/actions/utils.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py

18-18: tensorflow.python.ops.gen_batch_ops.batch imported but unused

Remove unused import: tensorflow.python.ops.gen_batch_ops.batch

(F401)


102-102: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)


171-171: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


174-174: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

kairon/nlu/__init__.py

1-1: .classifiers.llm.LLMClassifier imported but unused; consider removing, adding to __all__, or using a redundant alias

(F401)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
requirements/prod.txt (1)

70-71: Dependencies updated appropriately

The additions of huggingface-hub==0.25.2 and more-itertools are appropriate and necessary based on the code changes.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py (5)

24-24: Remove duplicate import

The os module is already imported on line 15.

-import os
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

24-24: Redefinition of unused os from line 15

Remove definition: os

(F811)


34-43: Add docstrings to Pydantic models

The Entities and ClassifierOutput models would benefit from docstrings explaining their purpose and field descriptions.

 class Entities(BaseModel):
+    """Represents an entity extracted from text.
+    
+    Attributes:
+        value: The actual text value of the entity
+        start: Starting position of the entity in text
+        end: Ending position of the entity in text
+        entity: Type of the entity
+    """
     value: str
     start: int
     end: int
     entity: str

 class ClassifierOutput(BaseModel):
+    """Represents the output from the LLM classifier.
+    
+    Attributes:
+        intent: The classified intent
+        entities: List of extracted entities, if any
+    """
     intent: str
     entities: List[Entities] = None

192-192: Review hardcoded confidence value

Setting a hardcoded confidence value of 1 may be misleading as it suggests absolute certainty in the classification. Consider:

  1. Getting a confidence score from the LLM response
  2. Using a configurable default value
  3. Adding a comment explaining why a hardcoded value is used

103-103: Remove unnecessary f-string

The string doesn't contain any placeholders, so the f prefix is unnecessary.

-                f"either set bot_id'in LLMClassifier config or set LLM_API_KEY in environment variables"
+                "either set bot_id'in LLMClassifier config or set LLM_API_KEY in environment variables"
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

103-103: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)


48-49: Enhance class documentation

The class documentation could be more comprehensive. Consider adding:

  1. Detailed description of the classification approach
  2. Documentation for configuration options
  3. Usage examples
 class LLMClassifier(IntentClassifier, GraphComponent, ABC):
-    """Intent and Entity classifiers using the OpenAI Completion framework"""
+    """Intent and Entity classifier using Large Language Models.
+    
+    This classifier uses LLMs through the litellm library to perform intent classification
+    and entity extraction. It maintains a vector store of training examples using FAISS
+    for efficient similarity search.
+    
+    Configuration Options:
+        bot_id: Optional bot identifier for API key lookup
+        prediction_model: LLM model to use for predictions (default: gpt-4o-mini)
+        embedding_model: Model for text embeddings (default: text-embedding-3-small)
+        embedding_size: Size of embeddings (default: 1536)
+        top_k: Number of similar examples to use (default: 5)
+        temperature: LLM temperature parameter (default: 0.0)
+        max_tokens: Maximum tokens in response (default: 50)
+        retry: Number of retry attempts (default: 3)
+    """
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5daf69f and aa0cf20.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py (8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py

24-24: Redefinition of unused os from line 15

Remove definition: os

(F811)


103-103: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)


172-172: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


175-175: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py (2)

143-143: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure proper type conversion when concatenating entity data

self.data[i][ENTITIES] may be a list or None, and concatenating it directly to a string may cause a TypeError. Convert entities to a JSON string before concatenating.

-            context += "text: "+self.data[i]["intent"]+"\nclassifier: {'intent': "+self.data[i][INTENT]+", 'entities': "+self.data[i][ENTITIES]+"}"
+            context += "text: "+self.data[i]["intent"]+"\nclassifier: {'intent': "+self.data[i][INTENT]+", 'entities': "+json.dumps(self.data[i][ENTITIES])+"}"

26-27: Review global litellm configuration

Setting global configurations (drop_params and LITELLM_LOG) might affect other parts of the application that use litellm. Consider moving these configurations to a more isolated scope or documenting the impact.

✅ Verification successful

Global litellm configuration is safe to use

The global configuration settings are only used in kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py and while other files import litellm, they don't interact with these specific configurations. The drop_params setting and log level are reasonable defaults that won't negatively impact other parts of the application.

  • litellm.drop_params = True is a safe optimization to reduce memory usage
  • LITELLM_LOG = "ERROR" is a reasonable log level that only suppresses non-critical messages
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other usages of litellm in the codebase
rg "import litellm" -l

Length of output: 302


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for actual usage of litellm.drop_params and LITELLM_LOG in the codebase
rg "litellm\.drop_params" -A 2
rg "LITELLM_LOG" -A 2

Length of output: 372


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of litellm usage in the file to understand the scope
rg -B 5 -A 10 "litellm\.drop_params" kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py

Length of output: 382

@digiteinfotech digiteinfotech deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Dec 5, 2024
@digiteinfotech digiteinfotech deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Dec 5, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py (2)

90-90: Remove unnecessary f-string prefix in error message

The f-string prefix f is unnecessary here because the string does not contain any variables to interpolate. Removing the f prefix simplifies the code.

Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary f prefix:

-                 f"either set bot_id'in LLMClassifier config or set LLM_API_KEY in environment variables"
+                 "either set bot_id'in LLMClassifier config or set LLM_API_KEY in environment variables"
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

90-90: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)


196-198: Simplify dictionary key checks by removing .keys()

When checking if a key exists in a dictionary, use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys(). This is more efficient and idiomatic Python.

Apply this diff to simplify the key checks:

-             intent = responses["intent"] if "intent" in responses.keys() else "nlu_fallback"
-             explanation = responses["explanation"] if "explanation" in responses.keys() else None
-             entities = responses["entities"]if "entities" in responses.keys() else []
+             intent = responses["intent"] if "intent" in responses else "nlu_fallback"
+             explanation = responses["explanation"] if "explanation" in responses else None
+             entities = responses["entities"] if "entities" in responses else []
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

196-196: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


197-197: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


198-198: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa0cf20 and bcdce95.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py

90-90: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)


196-196: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


197-197: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


198-198: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

for i in indx[0]:
if self.data[i].get(INTENT):
intents.add(self.data[i][INTENT])
entities = set([entity[ENTITY_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE] for entity in entities])
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Potential logical error when building entities set

At this line, entities is being reassigned using a list comprehension over itself, which was initialized as an empty set. This means entities will remain empty. To extract entity types correctly, you should iterate over the entities from the data point.

Consider correcting the logic as follows:

-                 entities = set([entity[ENTITY_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE] for entity in entities])
+                 entities.update(set([entity[ENTITY_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE] for entity in self.data[i][ENTITIES] or []]))

Would you like assistance in updating this logic?

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
entities = set([entity[ENTITY_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE] for entity in entities])
entities.update(set([entity[ENTITY_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE] for entity in self.data[i][ENTITIES] or []]))

with tqdm(len(training_data.intent_examples)) as pbar:
counter = 1
for chunks in chunked(training_data.intent_examples, batch_size):
data = [{"text": example.get(TEXT).strip(), INTENT: example.get(INTENT).strip(), ENTITIES: example.get(ENTITIES)} for example in chunks if example.get(INTENT) and example.get(INTENT)]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct redundant condition in list comprehension filter

The condition if example.get(INTENT) and example.get(INTENT) is redundant and likely a typo. The second example.get(INTENT) should probably be example.get(TEXT) to ensure both the intent and text are present.

Apply this diff to correct the condition:

-                    data = [{"text": example.get(TEXT).strip(), INTENT: example.get(INTENT).strip(), ENTITIES: example.get(ENTITIES)} for example in chunks if example.get(INTENT) and example.get(INTENT)]
+                    data = [{"text": example.get(TEXT).strip(), INTENT: example.get(INTENT).strip(), ENTITIES: example.get(ENTITIES)} for example in chunks if example.get(INTENT) and example.get(TEXT)]
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
data = [{"text": example.get(TEXT).strip(), INTENT: example.get(INTENT).strip(), ENTITIES: example.get(ENTITIES)} for example in chunks if example.get(INTENT) and example.get(INTENT)]
data = [{"text": example.get(TEXT).strip(), INTENT: example.get(INTENT).strip(), ENTITIES: example.get(ENTITIES)} for example in chunks if example.get(INTENT) and example.get(TEXT)]

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/testing_data/system.yaml (1)

236-236: Consider documenting the component changes

The replacement of traditional NLP components with LLMClassifier is a significant change. Consider adding documentation about:

  • The rationale behind this architectural change
  • Performance implications
  • Required dependencies

Also applies to: 240-240

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bcdce95 and a2cced7.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • kairon/shared/nlu/featurizer/openai.py (0 hunks)
  • system.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/testing_data/system.yaml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • kairon/shared/nlu/featurizer/openai.py
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/testing_data/system.yaml (1)

236-236: Verify the LLMClassifier integration with existing components

The addition of kairon.nlu.LLMClassifier represents a significant architectural change. Ensure that it properly integrates with the existing LanguageModelFeaturizer component.

✅ Verification successful

Integration between LLMClassifier and LanguageModelFeaturizer is properly designed

Based on the code analysis, the LLMClassifier and LanguageModelFeaturizer are independent components that work in a pipeline architecture, where:

  • LanguageModelFeaturizer is responsible for generating dense features from text using transformer models
  • LLMClassifier is a separate classifier that uses LLM APIs (via litellm) for intent classification and entity extraction
  • Both components are properly registered in the pipeline configuration (system.yaml) and follow Rasa's component interface
  • They operate independently without direct dependencies, which is the recommended approach for Rasa pipeline components

The architectural design follows best practices by:

  • Maintaining separation of concerns between feature extraction and classification
  • Following Rasa's component interface and registration patterns
  • Using standard input/output message formats for pipeline compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any potential conflicts or dependencies between components
ast-grep --pattern 'class LLMClassifier {
  $$$
  def process($$$) {
    $$$
  }
}'

# Check if the component is properly registered
rg -A 5 "register\(.*LLMClassifier.*\)"

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for LLMClassifier implementation
rg -l "class LLMClassifier"

# Search for any imports of LLMClassifier
rg "from.*import.*LLMClassifier|import.*LLMClassifier"

# Look for any usage or integration with LanguageModelFeaturizer
rg -A 5 "LanguageModelFeaturizer"

# Check the system.yaml file content
cat tests/testing_data/system.yaml

Length of output: 19420


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check LLMClassifier implementation details
cat kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py

# Check for any integration points between LLMClassifier and LanguageModelFeaturizer
rg -A 5 "from kairon.shared.nlu.featurizer.lm_featurizer import LanguageModelFeaturizer" kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py
rg -A 5 "LanguageModelFeaturizer" kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py

Length of output: 10920

system.yaml (2)

240-240: ⚠️ Potential issue

Review security implications of LLM integration

The integration of LLM components requires careful security consideration:

  1. Ensure proper rate limiting is in place
  2. Verify token/key management
  3. Check for potential data privacy concerns

Also applies to: 236-236


240-240: Verify the LLMClassifier integration in production environment

The addition of kairon.nlu.LLMClassifier in production configuration should be thoroughly tested:

  1. Ensure backward compatibility
  2. Verify performance metrics
  3. Check resource requirements

@@ -236,11 +236,8 @@ properties:

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement comprehensive testing strategy

Given the significant architectural change with LLMClassifier:

  1. Add integration tests for the new component
  2. Update existing test cases
  3. Document testing requirements for both development and production environments

Also applies to: 240-240

Copy link
Collaborator

@hiteshghuge hiteshghuge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved

@sfahad1414 sfahad1414 merged commit b7f6d23 into master Dec 6, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
himanshugt16 pushed a commit to himanshugt16/kairon that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
* added llm classifier

* log corrected

* prompt corrected

* removed unused import

* removed unused import
@sfahad1414 sfahad1414 deleted the llm-calssifier branch December 13, 2024 03:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants