Mail channel first iteration #1620
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant enhancements to the Kairon framework, particularly in the area of email handling. It adds new command-line interface (CLI) commands for processing and reading emails, integrates new API endpoints for retrieving mail channel logs, and introduces several new classes and methods for managing email events and processing. Additionally, it includes extensive test coverage for the new functionalities, ensuring robustness and reliability in handling email-related tasks. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 25
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (32)
tests/unit_test/data_processor/data_processor_test.py (2)
3988-3997: Remove duplicate assertion and optimize dict operationsThere are a few improvements that can be made to this test segment:
- Line 3999 contains a duplicate assertion for
domain.forms.__len__() == 2- The
.keys()method call is unnecessary when checking lengthApply this diff to improve the code:
-assert domain.responses.keys().__len__() == 29 +assert len(domain.responses) == 29 -assert domain.forms.__len__() == 2 -assert domain.forms.__len__() == 2 +assert domain.forms.__len__() == 2🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
3992-3992: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
3994-3994: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
7133-7142: Consider refactoring repetitive test patternsThere are multiple test methods with similar assertion patterns. Consider:
- Creating helper methods for common assertion patterns
- Using parameterized tests for different scenarios
- Consistently using
len()instead of__len__()and avoiding.keys()Example helper method:
def assert_domain_properties(self, domain, expected_counts): """ Helper to verify domain properties Args: domain: Domain instance to verify expected_counts: dict with expected counts for slots, entities, etc. """ assert len(domain.slots) == expected_counts['slots'] assert len(domain.entities) == expected_counts['entities'] assert len(domain.responses) == expected_counts['responses'] assert len(domain.intents) == expected_counts['intents']Example usage:
self.assert_domain_properties(domain, { 'slots': 27, 'entities': 27, 'responses': 29, 'intents': 32 })Also applies to: 7198-7200, 7278-7287, 7343-7352, 7393-7402, 7451-7460, 7496-7505, 7551-7554, 7629-7632
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
7137-7137: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
7139-7139: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
kairon/events/definitions/mail_channel.py (2)
90-90: ReplaceUsing
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-90 print(vals) +90 logger.debug(f"Mail read values: {vals}")
57-59: Correct typo in docstringThere's a typo in the docstring. Replace "tp" with "to" for clarity.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
57 """ -58 Event to read mails from mail channel and create events for each mail tp process them via bot +58 Event to read mails from mail channel and create events for each mail to process them via bot 59 """kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py (1)
127-131: Simplify complex list comprehension for readabilityThe multi-level list comprehension used to parse slots reduces readability. Consider refactoring it into a standard loop for better clarity.
Suggested refactor:
slots = {} for slot_str in rasa_chat_response.get('slots', []): split_result = slot_str.split(":", 1) if len(split_result) == 2: key, value = split_result slots[key.strip()] = value.strip()tests/unit_test/channels/mail_channel_test.py (4)
1-1: Remove unused import 'asyncio'The
asynciomodule is imported but not used in this file. Consider removing it to clean up the imports.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-1 import asyncio🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
1-1:
asyncioimported but unusedRemove unused import:
asyncio(F401)
9-9: Remove unused import 'uuid7'The
uuid7function is imported but not used in this file. Consider removing it to clean up the imports.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-9 from uuid6 import uuid7🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
9-9:
uuid6.uuid7imported but unusedRemove unused import:
uuid6.uuid7(F401)
14-14: Use capitalized environment variable nameEnvironment variable names are conventionally uppercase. Replace
system_filewithSYSTEM_FILEfor consistency.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-14 os.environ["system_file"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml" +14 os.environ["SYSTEM_FILE"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml"🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
14-14: Use capitalized environment variable
SYSTEM_FILEinstead ofsystem_fileReplace
system_filewithSYSTEM_FILE(SIM112)
484-485: Simplify nestedwithstatements and remove unused variableYou can combine multiple context managers into a single
withstatement for better readability. Also, the variablemock_saveis assigned but not used; consider removing it.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-484 with patch.object(MailChannelStateData, 'save', return_value=None) as mock_save: -485 with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.data_objects.MailChannelStateData', return_value=mock_state): +484 with patch.object(MailChannelStateData, 'save', return_value=None), \ + patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.data_objects.MailChannelStateData', return_value=mock_state):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
484-485: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
484-484: Local variable
mock_saveis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
mock_save(F841)
tests/unit_test/utility_test.py (2)
Line range hint
2668-2669: Consider adding an assertion to confirm expected behaviorIn the
test_verify_email_disablemethod, consider adding an assertion to explicitly verify that email verification passes without exceptions when verification is disabled. This will enhance test clarity and ensure the test accurately reflects the expected outcome.
Line range hint
2750-2785: Consider adding an assertion to confirm successful email verificationIn the
test_verify_email_enable_valid_emailmethod, consider adding an explicit assertion to confirm that no exception is raised for valid emails. While the absence of an exception implies success, an assertion improves test readability and clarity.kairon/cli/mail_channel_read.py (1)
20-26: Add input validation for bot and user argumentsThe CLI arguments for bot and user are accepted without any validation. Consider adding validation patterns to ensure the input meets expected formats.
mail_parser.add_argument('bot', type=str, - help="Bot id for which command is executed", action='store') + help="Bot id for which command is executed (alphanumeric)", + action='store', + pattern=r'^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$') mail_parser.add_argument('user', type=str, - help="Kairon user who is initiating the command", action='store') + help="Kairon user who is initiating the command (email format)", + action='store', + pattern=r'^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$')kairon/shared/channels/mail/data_objects.py (2)
9-19: Add data validation and index optimizationThe
MailChannelStateDataclass could benefit from additional validation and index optimization.class MailChannelStateData(Document): - event_id = StringField() + event_id = StringField(required=True, unique_with='bot') last_email_uid = IntField(default=0) bot = StringField(required=True) timestamp = FloatField(default=time.time()) - meta = {"indexes": ["bot"]} + meta = { + "indexes": [ + "bot", + {"fields": ["bot", "timestamp"], "expire_after_seconds": 2592000} # 30 days + ], + "allow_inheritance": True + }
21-24: Consider adding intermediate status for better trackingThe
MailStatusenum could benefit from additional states for better tracking of email processing stages.class MailStatus(Enum): Processing = "processing" + VALIDATING = "validating" + SENDING = "sending" SUCCESS = "success" FAILED = "failed" + RETRYING = "retrying"kairon/events/definitions/factory.py (1)
24-26: Consider grouping related events togetherThe mail channel events could be grouped with other channel-related events for better organization.
Consider reordering the events:
__events = { EventClass.model_training: ModelTrainingEvent, EventClass.model_testing: ModelTestingEvent, EventClass.delete_history: DeleteHistoryEvent, EventClass.data_importer: TrainingDataImporterEvent, EventClass.multilingual: MultilingualEvent, EventClass.faq_importer: FaqDataImporterEvent, EventClass.message_broadcast: MessageBroadcastEvent, + EventClass.mail_channel_read_mails: MailReadEvent, + EventClass.mail_channel_process_mails: MailProcessEvent, EventClass.content_importer: DocContentImporterEvent, - EventClass.mail_channel_read_mails: MailReadEvent, - EventClass.mail_channel_process_mails: MailProcessEvent }metadata/integrations.yml (1)
78-87: Consider enhancing mail channel configuration for security and completenessThe mail channel configuration could benefit from additional fields for secure and robust email handling:
Security:
- Add SSL/TLS configuration options for both IMAP and SMTP
- Consider adding OAuth2 support as an alternative to password authentication
Missing configurations:
- Add IMAP port configuration (currently only SMTP port is specified)
- Add connection timeout settings
- Add max email size limit
Documentation needed:
- Clarify the purpose and format of the 'interval' field (is it polling interval in seconds?)
- Clarify the purpose of the 'intent' field
Would you like me to propose an enhanced configuration structure with these additions?
kairon/__init__.py (2)
47-48: Consider splitting long import statement for better readabilityThe import statement is becoming lengthy. Consider splitting it across multiple lines:
-from kairon.cli import importer, training, testing, conversations_deletion, translator, delete_logs,\ - message_broadcast,content_importer, mail_channel_process, mail_channel_read +from kairon.cli import ( + importer, + training, + testing, + conversations_deletion, + translator, + delete_logs, + message_broadcast, + content_importer, + mail_channel_process, + mail_channel_read, +)
Line range hint
1-46: Update CLI documentation to include mail channel commandsThe docstring needs to be updated to include documentation for the new mail channel commands.
Add the following to the docstring:
Message broadcast: kairon broadcast <botid> <userid> <eventid> <is_resend> + Mail channel processing: + kairon mail-channel-process <botid> <userid> + + Mail channel reading: + kairon mail-channel-read <botid> <userid> + Delete audit logs: kairon delete-logskairon/chat/agent_processor.py (1)
82-99: Consider performance implications of uncached agentsThe method bypasses the cache mechanism which could lead to:
- Increased memory usage if called frequently
- Slower response times due to loading the model each time
- Potential resource exhaustion
Consider:
- Adding a warning log when this method is called
- Documenting the performance implications
- Adding metrics to track usage
tests/unit_test/channels/mail_scheduler_test.py (4)
8-8: Use uppercase for environment variable nameEnvironment variables should use uppercase naming convention.
-os.environ["system_file"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml" +os.environ["SYSTEM_FILE"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml"🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
8-8: Use capitalized environment variable
SYSTEM_FILEinstead ofsystem_fileReplace
system_filewithSYSTEM_FILE(SIM112)
23-23: Extract magic numbers into named constantsThe mock response contains magic numbers that should be extracted into named constants for better maintainability.
+# At the top of the file +DEFAULT_MAIL_CHECK_INTERVAL = 60 +DEFAULT_TEST_EMAIL = '[email protected]' - mock_read_mails.return_value = ([], '[email protected]', 60) # Mock responses and next_delay + mock_read_mails.return_value = ([], DEFAULT_TEST_EMAIL, DEFAULT_MAIL_CHECK_INTERVAL)
37-45: Add docstrings to test functionsTest functions should have docstrings describing the test scenario and expected behavior.
Example for the first test:
def test_request_epoch_success(mock_execute_http_request, mock_get_event_server_url, mock_imp, mock_smpt): + """ + Test successful execution of request_epoch: + - Given: A valid bot ID and successful HTTP response + - When: request_epoch is called + - Then: No exception should be raised + """Also applies to: 50-55, 60-65
83-83: Remove commented line numberRemove the commented line number as it's not providing any value.
-# # Test case when event_id is None + # Test case when event_id is Nonetests/unit_test/data_processor/agent_processor_test.py (1)
138-143: Add docstring to the test method.The test implementation looks good and follows the existing patterns. Consider adding a docstring to document the test's purpose and expectations.
def test_get_agent_no_cache(self): + """ + Test retrieval of agent without using cache. + + Verifies that: + - Agent is successfully retrieved + - Training history exists + - Model version is valid + """ model = AgentProcessor.get_agent_without_cache(pytest.bot, False) assert model assert len(list(ModelProcessor.get_training_history(pytest.bot))) == 1 assert not Utility.check_empty_string(model.model_ver)tests/integration_test/event_service_test.py (1)
536-545: Add test cases for error scenarios.The current test only covers the success path. Consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid bot ID
- Failed scheduling scenarios
- Error response structure
@patch('kairon.events.utility.EventUtility.schedule_channel_mail_reading') def test_request_epoch_invalid_bot(mock_epoch): mock_epoch.side_effect = ValueError("Invalid bot") response = client.get('/api/mail/schedule/invalid_bot') assert response.status_code == 400 resp = response.json() assert not resp['success'] assert "Invalid bot" in resp['message'] @patch('kairon.events.utility.EventUtility.schedule_channel_mail_reading') def test_request_epoch_scheduling_failed(mock_epoch): mock_epoch.side_effect = Exception("Scheduling failed") response = client.get('/api/mail/schedule/test_bot') assert response.status_code == 500 resp = response.json() assert not resp['success'] assert "Scheduling failed" in resp['message']tests/unit_test/cli_test.py (3)
321-326: Use capitalized environment variable name.Follow Python naming conventions for environment variables.
-os.environ["system_file"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml" +os.environ["SYSTEM_FILE"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml"🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
323-323: Use capitalized environment variable
SYSTEM_FILEinstead ofsystem_fileReplace
system_filewithSYSTEM_FILE(SIM112)
340-352: Combine nested with statements.Improve code readability by combining the nested with statements.
- with patch('argparse.ArgumentParser.parse_args', - return_value=argparse.Namespace(func=process_channel_mails, - bot="test_bot", - user="test_user", mails=data)): - with pytest.raises(ValueError): - cli() + with ( + patch('argparse.ArgumentParser.parse_args', + return_value=argparse.Namespace(func=process_channel_mails, + bot="test_bot", + user="test_user", mails=data)), + pytest.raises(ValueError) + ): + cli()🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
345-349: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
353-361: Add test cases for mail read failures.Consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid bot configuration
- Mail server connection failures
- Authentication errors
@mock.patch("kairon.cli.mail_channel_read.MailReadEvent.execute") def test_start_mail_channel_read_invalid_config(self, mock_execute): mock_execute.side_effect = ValueError("Invalid mail configuration") with patch('argparse.ArgumentParser.parse_args', return_value=argparse.Namespace(func=read_channel_mails, bot="test_bot", user="test_user")): with pytest.raises(ValueError): cli() mock_execute.assert_called_once() @mock.patch("kairon.cli.mail_channel_read.MailReadEvent.execute") def test_start_mail_channel_read_connection_error(self, mock_execute): mock_execute.side_effect = ConnectionError("Failed to connect to mail server") with patch('argparse.ArgumentParser.parse_args', return_value=argparse.Namespace(func=read_channel_mails, bot="test_bot", user="test_user")): with pytest.raises(ConnectionError): cli() mock_execute.assert_called_once()kairon/shared/data/data_models.py (2)
1343-1344: Class documentation neededAdd docstring to explain the purpose and usage of
ScheduleActionRequestclass.class ScheduleActionRequest(BaseModel): + """ + Data model for validating schedule action requests. + + Attributes: + name: Name of the schedule action + schedule_time: Time when action should be scheduled + timezone: Timezone for scheduling + schedule_action: Action to be executed + response_text: Optional response text + params_list: Optional list of parameters + dispatch_bot_response: Whether to dispatch bot response + """
Line range hint
1343-1363: Consider adding field descriptions and type hintsAdd field descriptions using Pydantic's Field class to improve code documentation and type safety.
class ScheduleActionRequest(BaseModel): - name: constr(to_lower=True, strip_whitespace=True) - schedule_time: CustomActionDynamicParameterModel - timezone: str = None - schedule_action: str - response_text: Optional[str] - params_list: Optional[List[HttpActionParameters]] - dispatch_bot_response: bool = True + name: constr(to_lower=True, strip_whitespace=True) = Field( + ..., description="Name of the schedule action") + schedule_time: CustomActionDynamicParameterModel = Field( + ..., description="Time when action should be scheduled") + timezone: str = Field( + None, description="Timezone for scheduling") + schedule_action: str = Field( + ..., description="Action to be executed") + response_text: Optional[str] = Field( + None, description="Optional response text") + params_list: Optional[List[HttpActionParameters]] = Field( + None, description="Optional list of parameters") + dispatch_bot_response: bool = Field( + True, description="Whether to dispatch bot response")tests/unit_test/events/definitions_test.py (2)
1258-1259: Remove unused importThe
patchimport is already available from the top-level imports.- from unittest.mock import patch🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
1258-1258:
unittest.mock.patchimported but unusedRemove unused import:
unittest.mock.patch(F401)
1307-1333: Add docstrings to test methodsAdd descriptive docstrings to test methods to explain test scenarios and expectations.
@patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.read_mails') @patch('kairon.events.definitions.mail_channel.MailProcessEvent.enqueue') @patch('kairon.events.definitions.mail_channel.MailProcessEvent.validate') def test_mail_read_event_execute(self, mock_validate, mock_enqueue, mock_read_mails): + """ + Test successful execution of mail read event: + 1. Verify mails are read correctly + 2. Verify validation is performed + 3. Verify enqueue is called with correct parameters + """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
kairon/__init__.py(2 hunks)kairon/api/app/routers/bot/bot.py(2 hunks)kairon/chat/agent_processor.py(1 hunks)kairon/chat/utils.py(1 hunks)kairon/cli/mail_channel_process.py(1 hunks)kairon/cli/mail_channel_read.py(1 hunks)kairon/events/definitions/factory.py(2 hunks)kairon/events/definitions/mail_channel.py(1 hunks)kairon/events/server.py(2 hunks)kairon/events/utility.py(2 hunks)kairon/shared/channels/mail/constants.py(1 hunks)kairon/shared/channels/mail/data_objects.py(1 hunks)kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py(1 hunks)kairon/shared/channels/mail/scheduler.py(1 hunks)kairon/shared/chat/processor.py(1 hunks)kairon/shared/constants.py(3 hunks)kairon/shared/data/data_models.py(1 hunks)metadata/integrations.yml(1 hunks)requirements/prod.txt(1 hunks)system.yaml(1 hunks)tests/integration_test/action_service_test.py(3 hunks)tests/integration_test/event_service_test.py(1 hunks)tests/integration_test/services_test.py(6 hunks)tests/testing_data/system.yaml(2 hunks)tests/unit_test/channels/mail_channel_test.py(1 hunks)tests/unit_test/channels/mail_scheduler_test.py(1 hunks)tests/unit_test/chat/chat_test.py(2 hunks)tests/unit_test/cli_test.py(2 hunks)tests/unit_test/data_processor/agent_processor_test.py(1 hunks)tests/unit_test/data_processor/data_processor_test.py(19 hunks)tests/unit_test/events/definitions_test.py(1 hunks)tests/unit_test/utility_test.py(1 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (2)
- tests/integration_test/action_service_test.py: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
- tests/unit_test/data_processor/data_processor_test.py: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- system.yaml
- kairon/shared/channels/mail/constants.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
tests/integration_test/action_service_test.py
6-6: Use capitalized environment variable SYSTEM_FILE instead of system_file
Replace system_file with SYSTEM_FILE
(SIM112)
tests/unit_test/data_processor/data_processor_test.py
3992-3992: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
3994-3994: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7137-7137: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7139-7139: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7282-7282: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7284-7284: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7347-7347: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7349-7349: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7397-7397: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7399-7399: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7455-7455: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7457-7457: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7500-7500: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
7502-7502: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
kairon/events/server.py
151-151: Do not perform function call Path in argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable
(B008)
kairon/events/utility.py
62-62: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
72-72: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
tests/unit_test/channels/mail_scheduler_test.py
8-8: Use capitalized environment variable SYSTEM_FILE instead of system_file
Replace system_file with SYSTEM_FILE
(SIM112)
kairon/api/app/routers/bot/bot.py
1666-1667: Do not perform function call Security in argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable
(B008)
tests/unit_test/channels/mail_channel_test.py
1-1: asyncio imported but unused
Remove unused import: asyncio
(F401)
9-9: uuid6.uuid7 imported but unused
Remove unused import: uuid6.uuid7
(F401)
14-14: Use capitalized environment variable SYSTEM_FILE instead of system_file
Replace system_file with SYSTEM_FILE
(SIM112)
484-485: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
484-484: Local variable mock_save is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable mock_save
(F841)
tests/unit_test/cli_test.py
323-323: Use capitalized environment variable SYSTEM_FILE instead of system_file
Replace system_file with SYSTEM_FILE
(SIM112)
345-349: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
kairon/events/definitions/mail_channel.py
39-39: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
51-51: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
82-82: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
98-98: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
tests/unit_test/events/definitions_test.py
1214-1215: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
1214-1214: Local variable mp is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable mp
(F841)
1215-1215: Local variable mock_login is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable mock_login
(F841)
1216-1216: Local variable mock_logout is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable mock_logout
(F841)
1258-1258: unittest.mock.patch imported but unused
Remove unused import: unittest.mock.patch
(F401)
1286-1288: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py
50-50: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
165-165: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
219-219: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
🔇 Additional comments (25)
tests/unit_test/data_processor/data_processor_test.py (2)
3883-3889: LGTM! Comprehensive verification of mail-related domain configuration
The test properly verifies the integration of mail channel slots and entities into the domain configuration.
9378-9387: LGTM! Well-structured mail slot configurations
The test data properly defines the new mail-related slots with appropriate properties:
- All mail slots (mail_id, subject, body) are correctly configured to influence conversation
- Default status is properly set
- Deep comparison ensures exact property matching
tests/integration_test/action_service_test.py (3)
24-25: LGTM!
The import organization with visual separation looks good.
11758-11758: LGTM! Well-structured test setup
The test function is well-organized with appropriate mocks and follows good testing practices.
Also applies to: 11758-11761
11758-11761: Verify mail channel test coverage
Given that this PR implements mail channel functionality, ensure that corresponding test cases for mail channel features are also included.
✅ Verification successful
Mail channel test coverage is comprehensive
The codebase includes extensive test coverage for mail channel functionality:
mail_channel_test.pycontains 20+ test cases covering IMAP/SMTP operations, mail processing, connection validation, and state managementmail_scheduler_test.pyincludes 7 test cases for scheduling and epoch-related functionality- Tests cover both success and failure scenarios for critical operations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for mail channel related test files and test functions
# Search for mail channel related test files
echo "Searching for mail channel test files..."
fd -e py "mail.*test" "tests/"
# Search for mail channel related test functions
echo "Searching for mail channel test functions..."
rg -l "def test.*mail" "tests/"
Length of output: 800
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of mail channel test files to verify coverage
echo "Content of mail_channel_test.py:"
rg "def test_" "tests/unit_test/channels/mail_channel_test.py" -A 1
echo -e "\nContent of mail_scheduler_test.py:"
rg "def test_" "tests/unit_test/channels/mail_scheduler_test.py" -A 1
Length of output: 3875
tests/unit_test/utility_test.py (7)
Line range hint 2671-2709: Test test_verify_email_enable_disposable_email correctly handles disposable emails
The test accurately simulates a disposable email scenario and asserts that an exception is raised as expected when a disposable email is provided.
Line range hint 2711-2748: Test test_verify_email_enable_invalid_email correctly handles invalid emails
This test effectively verifies that an exception is raised for invalid emails, ensuring robust validation in the email verification process.
2851-2852: Update to include new channels in expected_channels
The addition of "line" and "mail" to the expected_channels list in test_get_channels aligns with the newly integrated channels and ensures the test accurately reflects the updated functionality.
Line range hint 2861-2874: test_get_channels method correctly validates channel list
The test ensures that Utility.get_channels() returns the expected list of channels, including the new "line" and "mail" channels. This effectively verifies the integration of the new channels.
Line range hint 2869-2877: Timezone conversion test accurately validates functionality
The test_convertdatetime_with_timezone method correctly tests the Utility.convert_utcdate_with_timezone function, confirming that the datetime conversion from UTC to "Asia/Kolkata" timezone is accurate.
Line range hint 2808-2820: Test test_get_llm_hyperparameters validates hyperparameters correctly
The test asserts that Utility.get_llm_hyperparameters("openai") returns the correct hyperparameters, ensuring that the LLM configuration is as expected.
Line range hint 2822-2826: Proper exception handling for unsupported LLMs
The test_get_llm_hyperparameters_not_found method correctly verifies that an AppException is raised when requesting hyperparameters for an unsupported LLM, such as "gemini".
tests/integration_test/services_test.py (6)
4409-4410: Cosmetic changes look good.
4751-4751: Cosmetic changes look good.
23869-23871: Cosmetic changes look good.
8301-8301: Verify documentation for all 17 entities.
The test now expects 17 entities instead of 14, which aligns with the addition of mail-related fields. Please ensure all entities are properly documented.
9068-9069: Mail-related entity fields look good.
The addition of mail_id, subject, and body entities aligns with the mail channel implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the mail-related entities and their implementation.
Let me search for the mail entity implementation to verify the fields.
Mail-related entity fields are properly implemented
The verification confirms that mail_id, subject, and body fields are correctly implemented in the codebase:
MailResponseLogclass inkairon/shared/channels/mail/data_objects.pydefines the required fields:subject = StringField()body = StringField()
- The fields are also defined as constants in
kairon/shared/constants.py:mail_id = "mail_id"subject = "subject"body = "body"
- The fields are properly used in the mail processor (
kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py) for handling mail responses and processing incoming mails.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of mail-related entities
# Expected: Find corresponding entity definitions and handlers
# Search for mail entity definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_(Entity|Constant):
$$$
mail_id = $$$
$$$
'
# Search for mail entity handlers
rg -A 5 "def (process|handle).*mail"
Length of output: 1145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mail-related entity definitions and fields
rg -A 10 "class.*Mail"
# Search for mail_id, subject, and body fields in test files
rg -A 5 "(mail_id|subject|body)\s*=\s*" "tests/"
# Search for mail-related constants or configurations
rg -A 3 "MAIL_"
Length of output: 83347
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mail entity and response log definitions
rg -A 10 "class.*Mail.*Response" "kairon/"
# Search for mail_id, subject, and body fields in data objects
rg -A 5 "(mail_id|subject|body)\s*=\s*" "kairon/shared/"
Length of output: 33714
9707-9707: Verify documentation for all slots.
The test now expects:
- 24 total slots (increased)
- 17 default slots (increased)
These increases align with the mail channel implementation.
Also applies to: 9712-9712
requirements/prod.txt (1)
Line range hint 70-73: Fix dependency version constraints
Several dependencies lack version constraints, which could lead to breaking changes or security issues:
google-generativeaishould have a fixed versionmore-itertoolsshould have a fixed version- Consider updating
imap-toolsto latest stable version for security fixes
Apply these version constraints:
-imap-tools==1.7.4
+imap-tools==1.8.0 # Latest stable version with security fixes
-google-generativeai
+google-generativeai==0.3.2 # Latest stable version
-more-itertools
+more-itertools==10.2.0 # Latest stable version
python-multipart>=0.0.18Let's verify the latest stable versions and any security advisories:
✅ Verification successful
Update dependency version constraints with latest stable versions
Based on the PyPI data and security advisories check:
-imap-tools==1.7.4
-google-generativeai
-more-itertools
+imap-tools==1.7.4 # Current version is latest stable
+google-generativeai==0.8.3 # Latest stable version
+more-itertools==10.5.0 # Latest stable version
python-multipart>=0.0.18 # Correct minimum version for security patch- The current
imap-tools==1.7.4is actually the latest version, no security issues reported google-generativeaiandmore-itertoolsshould be pinned to their latest stable versions- The
python-multipart>=0.0.18constraint is correct as it ensures the version is above the security patch (CVE fixes in 0.0.18)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PyPI for latest versions and potential security issues
for pkg in "imap-tools" "google-generativeai" "more-itertools" "python-multipart"; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/$pkg/json" | jq -r '.info.version'
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query="{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: \"$pkg\") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}"
done
Length of output: 2872
tests/testing_data/system.yaml (1)
124-124: LGTM! Configuration follows best practices.
The mail-related configurations are well-structured:
- Follow existing naming patterns
- Use environment variables with sensible defaults
- Properly placed in relevant sections
Also applies to: 144-144
kairon/chat/utils.py (1)
46-66: LGTM! Well-documented method signature.
The method signature is clear and the docstring provides good documentation of parameters and return value.
tests/unit_test/cli_test.py (1)
327-338: LGTM! Good test coverage for successful mail processing.
The test properly verifies the successful execution of mail channel processing.
kairon/api/app/routers/bot/bot.py (3)
28-28: LGTM!
The import statement for MailProcessor is correctly placed and necessary for the new mail channel logs functionality.
1664-1672: LGTM! The endpoint is well-implemented.
The implementation follows the established patterns in the codebase:
- Proper pagination parameters
- Consistent security scope (TESTER_ACCESS)
- Clear docstring
- Appropriate delegation to the MailProcessor
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
1666-1667: Do not perform function call Security in argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable
(B008)
1671-1671: Verify error handling and response structure.
Please ensure that:
- The
MailProcessor.get_logmethod handles potential errors and exceptions appropriately - The response structure matches other similar endpoints in the codebase (e.g., pagination metadata)
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see the implementation of MailProcessor.get_log in kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py and similar log retrieval endpoints across the codebase. Let me check the error handling and response structure in more detail.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response regarding the error handling and response structure verification:
Error handling and response structure are properly implemented.
-
The
MailProcessor.get_logmethod has proper error handling:- Uses try-catch block to handle exceptions
- Raises
AppExceptionwith the error message - Returns a consistent response structure with
logsarray and totalcount
-
The endpoint implementation follows the codebase patterns:
- Uses standard pagination parameters (
start_idx,page_size) - Returns data wrapped in a
Responsemodel - Consistent with other log retrieval endpoints in the codebase
- Uses standard pagination parameters (
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check response structure consistency across similar endpoints
# Test: Search for similar log retrieval endpoints
rg -A 5 'def get_.*_logs.*page_size.*Response'
Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of MailProcessor.get_log and similar log retrieval methods
# Search for MailProcessor class and get_log method
ast-grep --pattern 'class MailProcessor:
$$$
def get_log($$$):
$$$'
# Search for similar log retrieval endpoints with different patterns
rg -A 5 'def get_.*log.*:'
# Check error handling patterns in the file
rg -B 2 -A 5 'except.*:' kairon/api/app/routers/bot/bot.py
Length of output: 14024
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of get_mail_channel_logs endpoint and MailProcessor.get_log
rg -B 5 -A 10 'async def get_mail_channel_logs' kairon/api/app/routers/bot/bot.py
# Check the complete implementation of MailProcessor.get_log
cat kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py
Length of output: 11777
| @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@ | |||
| import datetime | |||
| import os | |||
| from urllib.parse import urlencode, urljoin | |||
| from kairon.shared.utils import Utility | |||
| os.environ["system_file"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use uppercase for environment variable name
Following Python conventions, environment variables should be uppercase.
-os.environ["system_file"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml"
+os.environ["SYSTEM_FILE"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| os.environ["system_file"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml" | |
| os.environ["SYSTEM_FILE"] = "./tests/testing_data/system.yaml" |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
6-6: Use capitalized environment variable SYSTEM_FILE instead of system_file
Replace system_file with SYSTEM_FILE
(SIM112)
| except Exception as e: | ||
| raise AppException(f"Failed to schedule mail reading for bot {self.bot}. Error: {str(e)}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use exception chaining when re-raising exceptions
When re-raising an exception inside an except block, use exception chaining with raise ... from e to preserve the original traceback and provide better context.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
97 except Exception as e:
-98 raise AppException(f"Failed to schedule mail reading for bot {self.bot}. Error: {str(e)}")
+98 raise AppException(f"Failed to schedule mail reading for bot {self.bot}. Error: {str(e)}") from e📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| except Exception as e: | |
| raise AppException(f"Failed to schedule mail reading for bot {self.bot}. Error: {str(e)}") | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| raise AppException(f"Failed to schedule mail reading for bot {self.bot}. Error: {str(e)}") from e |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
98-98: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
| except Exception as e: | ||
| logger.error(str(e)) | ||
| raise AppException(e) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use exception chaining when re-raising exceptions
When re-raising an exception inside an except block, use exception chaining with raise ... from e to preserve the original traceback and provide better context.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
49 except Exception as e:
50 logger.error(str(e))
-51 raise AppException(e)
+51 raise AppException(e) from e📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error(str(e)) | |
| raise AppException(e) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error(str(e)) | |
| raise AppException(e) from e |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
51-51: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
| logger.error(str(e)) | ||
| raise AppException(e) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use exception chaining when re-raising exceptions
When re-raising an exception inside an except block, use exception chaining with raise ... from e to preserve the original traceback and provide better context.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
81 except Exception as e:
82 logger.error(str(e))
-83 raise AppException(e)
+83 raise AppException(e) from e📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| logger.error(str(e)) | |
| raise AppException(e) | |
| logger.error(str(e)) | |
| raise AppException(e) from e | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
82-82: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
| except Exception as e: | ||
| logger.error(str(e)) | ||
| raise AppException(e) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use exception chaining when re-raising exceptions
When re-raising an exception inside an except block, it's recommended to use exception chaining with raise ... from e to preserve the original traceback and provide better context.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
37 except Exception as e:
38 logger.error(str(e))
-39 raise AppException(e)
+39 raise AppException(e) from e📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error(str(e)) | |
| raise AppException(e) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error(str(e)) | |
| raise AppException(e) from e |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
39-39: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
| if configuration['connector_type'] == ChannelTypes.MAIL.value: | ||
| from kairon.shared.channels.mail.scheduler import MailScheduler | ||
| MailScheduler.request_epoch(bot) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for mail scheduler initialization.
While the implementation is correct, consider adding error handling for potential exceptions from MailScheduler.request_epoch(). This ensures graceful handling of SMTP/IMAP connection issues during mail channel configuration.
if configuration['connector_type'] == ChannelTypes.MAIL.value:
from kairon.shared.channels.mail.scheduler import MailScheduler
- MailScheduler.request_epoch(bot)
+ try:
+ MailScheduler.request_epoch(bot)
+ except Exception as e:
+ logger.error(f"Error initializing mail scheduler for bot {bot}: {str(e)}")
+ raise AppException(f"Failed to initialize mail channel: {str(e)}")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if configuration['connector_type'] == ChannelTypes.MAIL.value: | |
| from kairon.shared.channels.mail.scheduler import MailScheduler | |
| MailScheduler.request_epoch(bot) | |
| if configuration['connector_type'] == ChannelTypes.MAIL.value: | |
| from kairon.shared.channels.mail.scheduler import MailScheduler | |
| try: | |
| MailScheduler.request_epoch(bot) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error(f"Error initializing mail scheduler for bot {bot}: {str(e)}") | |
| raise AppException(f"Failed to initialize mail channel: {str(e)}") |
| responses = [] | ||
| uncached_model = AgentProcessor.get_agent_without_cache(bot, False) | ||
| metadata = ChatUtils.get_metadata(account, bot, is_integration_user, metadata) | ||
| for message in messages: | ||
| msg = UserMessage(message, sender_id=user, metadata=metadata) | ||
| chat_response = await uncached_model.handle_message(msg) | ||
| responses.append(chat_response) | ||
| return responses |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and input validation.
Consider adding:
- Input validation for empty messages list
- Error handling for failed message processing
- Type validation for message strings
@staticmethod
async def process_messages_via_bot(
messages: [str],
account: int,
bot: str,
user: str,
is_integration_user: bool = False,
metadata: Dict = None,
):
"""Process a list of messages through the bot.
Args:
messages: List of messages to process
account: Account ID
bot: Bot ID
user: User ID
is_integration_user: Flag indicating if user is integration user
metadata: Additional metadata
Returns:
List of responses from the bot
"""
+ if not messages:
+ raise ValueError("Messages list cannot be empty")
+ if not all(isinstance(msg, str) for msg in messages):
+ raise ValueError("All messages must be strings")
responses = []
uncached_model = AgentProcessor.get_agent_without_cache(bot, False)
metadata = ChatUtils.get_metadata(account, bot, is_integration_user, metadata)
for message in messages:
+ try:
msg = UserMessage(message, sender_id=user, metadata=metadata)
chat_response = await uncached_model.handle_message(msg)
responses.append(chat_response)
+ except Exception as e:
+ logger.error(f"Error processing message '{message}': {str(e)}")
+ responses.append({"error": f"Failed to process message: {str(e)}"})
return responses📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| responses = [] | |
| uncached_model = AgentProcessor.get_agent_without_cache(bot, False) | |
| metadata = ChatUtils.get_metadata(account, bot, is_integration_user, metadata) | |
| for message in messages: | |
| msg = UserMessage(message, sender_id=user, metadata=metadata) | |
| chat_response = await uncached_model.handle_message(msg) | |
| responses.append(chat_response) | |
| return responses | |
| if not messages: | |
| raise ValueError("Messages list cannot be empty") | |
| if not all(isinstance(msg, str) for msg in messages): | |
| raise ValueError("All messages must be strings") | |
| responses = [] | |
| uncached_model = AgentProcessor.get_agent_without_cache(bot, False) | |
| metadata = ChatUtils.get_metadata(account, bot, is_integration_user, metadata) | |
| for message in messages: | |
| try: | |
| msg = UserMessage(message, sender_id=user, metadata=metadata) | |
| chat_response = await uncached_model.handle_message(msg) | |
| responses.append(chat_response) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error(f"Error processing message '{message}': {str(e)}") | |
| responses.append({"error": f"Failed to process message: {str(e)}"}) | |
| return responses |
| @patch("kairon.chat.utils.AgentProcessor.get_agent_without_cache") | ||
| @patch("kairon.chat.utils.ChatUtils.get_metadata") | ||
| async def test_process_messages_via_bot(mock_get_metadata, mock_get_agent_without_cache): | ||
| messages = ["/greet", "/bye"] | ||
| account = 1 | ||
| bot = "test_bot" | ||
| user = "test_user" | ||
| is_integration_user = False | ||
| metadata = {"key": "value"} | ||
|
|
||
| mock_get_metadata.return_value = metadata | ||
| mock_model = MagicMock() | ||
| mock_get_agent_without_cache.return_value = mock_model | ||
| mock_model.handle_message = AsyncMock(side_effect=[{"text": "Hello"}, {"text": "Goodbye"}]) | ||
| from kairon.chat.utils import ChatUtils | ||
|
|
||
| responses = await ChatUtils.process_messages_via_bot(messages, account, bot, user, is_integration_user, metadata) | ||
|
|
||
| assert len(responses) == 2 | ||
| assert responses[0] == {"text": "Hello"} | ||
| assert responses[1] == {"text": "Goodbye"} | ||
| mock_get_metadata.assert_called_once_with(account, bot, is_integration_user, metadata) | ||
| mock_get_agent_without_cache.assert_called_once_with(bot, False) | ||
| assert mock_model.handle_message.call_count == 2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add more test scenarios for error handling
The current test only covers the happy path. Consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid messages
- Failed message processing
- Empty message list
- Invalid metadata
Example test case for error handling:
@pytest.mark.asyncio
@patch("kairon.chat.utils.AgentProcessor.get_agent_without_cache")
@patch("kairon.chat.utils.ChatUtils.get_metadata")
async def test_process_messages_via_bot_error(mock_get_metadata, mock_get_agent_without_cache):
messages = ["/greet"]
mock_get_metadata.return_value = {"key": "value"}
mock_model = MagicMock()
mock_get_agent_without_cache.return_value = mock_model
mock_model.handle_message = AsyncMock(side_effect=Exception("Failed to process message"))
with pytest.raises(Exception, match="Failed to process message"):
await ChatUtils.process_messages_via_bot(
messages, 1, "test_bot", "test_user", False, {"key": "value"}
)| with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.__init__', return_value=None) as mp: | ||
| with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_smtp', return_value=None) as mock_login: | ||
| with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_smtp', return_value=None) as mock_logout: | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify nested context managers and remove unused variables
Combine nested with statements and remove unused mock variables.
- with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.__init__', return_value=None) as mp:
- with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_smtp', return_value=None) as mock_login:
- with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_smtp', return_value=None) as mock_logout:
+ with (
+ patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.__init__', return_value=None),
+ patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_smtp', return_value=None),
+ patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_smtp', return_value=None)
+ ):📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.__init__', return_value=None) as mp: | |
| with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_smtp', return_value=None) as mock_login: | |
| with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_smtp', return_value=None) as mock_logout: | |
| with ( | |
| patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.__init__', return_value=None), | |
| patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_smtp', return_value=None), | |
| patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_smtp', return_value=None) | |
| ): |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
1214-1215: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
1214-1214: Local variable mp is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable mp
(F841)
1215-1215: Local variable mock_login is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable mock_login
(F841)
1216-1216: Local variable mock_logout is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable mock_logout
(F841)
| with patch("kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.process_message_task", | ||
| side_effect=Exception("Test")): | ||
| with pytest.raises(AppException, match="Test"): | ||
| MailProcessEvent("", "").execute(mails=["[email protected]"]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify nested context managers
Combine nested with statements for better readability.
- with patch("kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.process_message_task",
- side_effect=Exception("Test")):
- with pytest.raises(AppException, match="Test"):
- MailProcessEvent("", "").execute(mails=["[email protected]"])
+ with (
+ patch("kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.process_message_task",
+ side_effect=Exception("Test")),
+ pytest.raises(AppException, match="Test")
+ ):
+ MailProcessEvent("", "").execute(mails=["[email protected]"])📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| with patch("kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.process_message_task", | |
| side_effect=Exception("Test")): | |
| with pytest.raises(AppException, match="Test"): | |
| MailProcessEvent("", "").execute(mails=["[email protected]"]) | |
| with ( | |
| patch("kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.process_message_task", | |
| side_effect=Exception("Test")), | |
| pytest.raises(AppException, match="Test") | |
| ): | |
| MailProcessEvent("", "").execute(mails=["[email protected]"]) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
1286-1288: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation
Chores