Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

changes - #1635

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

hasinaxp
Copy link
Contributor

@hasinaxp hasinaxp commented Dec 11, 2024

removed process action event
updated mail log
removed reschedule logic

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced batch processing for mail reading functionality.
    • Introduced new configuration parameters for notifications and live agent interactions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for mail reading failures.
  • Documentation

    • Updated test documentation to reflect changes in mail processing tests.
  • Tests

    • Removed tests related to the deprecated mail channel process functionality.
    • Updated tests for mail reading to focus on new data structures and methods.

removed process action event
updated mail log
removed reschedule logic
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the removal of the mail_channel_process functionality from the Kairon framework. This includes deleting the associated command-line parser and processing logic, as well as modifying event handling classes and methods to reflect this removal. The MailProcessEvent class is eliminated, and the MailReadEvent class is updated to handle mail processing in batches. Configuration files and tests are also adjusted to align with these changes, streamlining the mail processing workflow.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
kairon/__init__.py Removed mail_channel_process subparser from argument parser.
kairon/cli/mail_channel_process.py Deleted file containing process_channel_mails and add_subparser functions.
kairon/events/definitions/factory.py Removed MailProcessEvent from __events dictionary.
kairon/events/definitions/mail_channel.py Removed MailProcessEvent class; updated MailReadEvent for batch processing and enhanced validation.
kairon/events/server.py Removed call to EventUtility.reschedule_all_bots_channel_mail_reading() in lifespan context manager.
kairon/events/utility.py Removed reschedule_all_bots_channel_mail_reading method.
kairon/shared/channels/mail/constants.py Updated PROCESS_MESSAGE_BATCH_SIZE constant from 4 to 8.
kairon/shared/channels/mail/data_objects.py Removed subject and body fields from MailResponseLog; added uid field.
kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py Updated read_mails method to remove time_shift return value and adjust message fetching logic.
kairon/shared/constants.py Removed mail_channel_process_mails entry from EventClass enum.
system.yaml Removed email_channel_process_mails parameter; added server_endpoint and live_agent_socket_url.
tests/unit_test/channels/mail_channel_test.py Updated tests to use uid instead of subject and body; modified return value assertions.
tests/unit_test/channels/mail_scheduler_test.py Removed tests for reschedule_all_bots_channel_mail_reading.
tests/unit_test/cli_test.py Removed tests for process_channel_mails functionality.
tests/unit_test/events/definitions_test.py Removed tests related to MailProcessEvent; updated tests for MailReadEvent.

Possibly related PRs

  • content importer fix #1527: This PR directly modifies the kairon/__init__.py file to add the content_importer subparser, which is relevant to the changes made in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • hiteshghuge

Poem

In the meadow, we hop and play,
With mail channels fading away.
No more processes to track and chase,
Just new paths for us to embrace.
With each change, we dance and cheer,
For a brighter future, we hold dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
kairon/shared/channels/mail/data_objects.py (1)

Line range hint 26-39: Update class documentation

The class documentation should be updated to reflect the schema changes and explain the purpose of the uid field.

 class MailResponseLog(Auditlog):
     """
     Mail response log
+    
+    Attributes:
+        uid: Unique identifier for the email message
+        sender_id: Identifier of the message sender
+        responses: List of responses generated
+        slots: Dictionary of slot values
+        bot: Bot identifier
+        user: User identifier
+        timestamp: Time of log creation
+        status: Current status of mail processing
     """
kairon/events/definitions/factory.py (1)

Line range hint 16-26: Update EventFactory documentation

Consider adding class-level documentation to explain the event registration pattern and available event types.

 class EventFactory:
+    """
+    Factory class for creating event handlers.
+    
+    The __events dictionary maps EventClass enums to their corresponding handler implementations.
+    Currently supported events include model training, testing, mail reading, and various import operations.
+    """
kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py (2)

256-263: Review message fetching logic

The new message fetching logic introduces a cleaner separation between first fetch and subsequent fetches. However, consider these improvements:

  1. Extract the time_shift calculation to a constant or configuration
  2. Consider adding a maximum message limit to prevent processing too many messages at once
+    DEFAULT_TIME_SHIFT = 20 * 60  # 20 minutes in seconds
+    MAX_MESSAGES_PER_FETCH = 100
     if last_processed_uid == 0:
-        time_shift = int(mp.config.get('interval', 20 * 60))
+        time_shift = int(mp.config.get('interval', DEFAULT_TIME_SHIFT))
         last_read_timestamp = datetime.now() - timedelta(seconds=time_shift)
-        msgs = mp.mailbox.fetch(AND(date_gte=last_read_timestamp.date()), mark_seen=False)
+        msgs = mp.mailbox.fetch(AND(date_gte=last_read_timestamp.date()), mark_seen=False, limit=MAX_MESSAGES_PER_FETCH)
     else:
         query = f'{int(last_processed_uid) + 1}:*'
-        msgs = mp.mailbox.fetch(AND(uid=query), mark_seen=False)
+        msgs = mp.mailbox.fetch(AND(uid=query), mark_seen=False, limit=MAX_MESSAGES_PER_FETCH)

294-299: Simplify error handling

The error handling could be simplified since both paths now return the same type of result:

-            return messages, mp.bot_settings.user
-        except Exception as e:
-            logger.exception(e)
-            if is_logged_in:
-                mp.logout_imap()
-            return [], mp.bot_settings.user
+        finally:
+            if is_logged_in:
+                mp.logout_imap()
+            return messages or [], mp.bot_settings.user
tests/unit_test/events/definitions_test.py (1)

1215-1224: Simplify nested context managers

The nested with statements can be simplified into a single statement with multiple contexts for better readability and maintainability.

-            with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.__init__', return_value=None) as mp:
-                with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_smtp',
-                           return_value=None) as mock_login:
-                    with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_smtp',
-                               return_value=None) as mock_logout:
-                        with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_imap',
-                                   return_value=None) as mock_login_imap:
-                            with patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_imap',
-                                       return_value=None) as mock_logout_imap:
-                                event.enqueue()
+            with (
+                patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.__init__', return_value=None),
+                patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_smtp', return_value=None),
+                patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_smtp', return_value=None),
+                patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.login_imap', return_value=None),
+                patch('kairon.shared.channels.mail.processor.MailProcessor.logout_imap', return_value=None)
+            ):
+                event.enqueue()
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

1215-1217: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements

(SIM117)


1215-1215: Local variable mp is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mp

(F841)


1217-1217: Local variable mock_login is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mock_login

(F841)


1219-1219: Local variable mock_logout is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mock_logout

(F841)


1221-1221: Local variable mock_login_imap is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mock_login_imap

(F841)


1223-1223: Local variable mock_logout_imap is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mock_logout_imap

(F841)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbcccc2 and b52635b.

📒 Files selected for processing (15)
  • kairon/__init__.py (1 hunks)
  • kairon/cli/mail_channel_process.py (0 hunks)
  • kairon/events/definitions/factory.py (1 hunks)
  • kairon/events/definitions/mail_channel.py (3 hunks)
  • kairon/events/server.py (0 hunks)
  • kairon/events/utility.py (0 hunks)
  • kairon/shared/channels/mail/constants.py (1 hunks)
  • kairon/shared/channels/mail/data_objects.py (1 hunks)
  • kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py (4 hunks)
  • kairon/shared/constants.py (0 hunks)
  • system.yaml (0 hunks)
  • tests/unit_test/channels/mail_channel_test.py (6 hunks)
  • tests/unit_test/channels/mail_scheduler_test.py (0 hunks)
  • tests/unit_test/cli_test.py (0 hunks)
  • tests/unit_test/events/definitions_test.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
  • kairon/shared/constants.py
  • tests/unit_test/cli_test.py
  • kairon/events/utility.py
  • kairon/events/server.py
  • kairon/cli/mail_channel_process.py
  • tests/unit_test/channels/mail_scheduler_test.py
  • system.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
tests/unit_test/events/definitions_test.py

1215-1217: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements

(SIM117)


1215-1215: Local variable mp is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mp

(F841)


1217-1217: Local variable mock_login is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mock_login

(F841)


1219-1219: Local variable mock_logout is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mock_logout

(F841)


1221-1221: Local variable mock_login_imap is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mock_login_imap

(F841)


1223-1223: Local variable mock_logout_imap is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable mock_logout_imap

(F841)

🔇 Additional comments (11)
kairon/shared/channels/mail/constants.py (1)

10-10: Verify impact of increased batch size

The batch size increase from 4 to 8 could affect memory usage and processing performance. Please ensure this change has been tested with representative data volumes.

Consider adding configuration flexibility by making this value configurable through environment variables for different deployment scenarios.

kairon/shared/channels/mail/data_objects.py (1)

31-31: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify data migration strategy

The addition of a required uid field and removal of subject/body fields represents a significant schema change.

Please ensure:

  1. Existing data is migrated appropriately
  2. All consumers of this class are updated to handle the new schema
  3. Consider adding a database migration script if needed
kairon/events/definitions/factory.py (1)

5-5: Verify cleanup of removed MailProcessEvent

The removal of MailProcessEvent requires thorough verification of all related code cleanup.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:

MailProcessEvent has been properly removed from the codebase

The verification shows that all references to MailProcessEvent have been completely removed from the codebase. The only remaining mail-related event is MailReadEvent, which handles both reading and processing of emails through the execute() method. The changes align with the PR objectives, and there are no lingering references that need cleanup.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to MailProcessEvent
rg "MailProcessEvent|mail_channel_process" --type py

# Check for any remaining imports
ast-grep --pattern 'from $_ import MailProcessEvent'

Length of output: 109


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to MailProcessEvent with broader pattern
rg "MailProcess|mail.*process" --type py -i

# Check event registration patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'self.__events = {
  $$$
}'

# Check mail channel related files specifically
fd "mail.*\.py$" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 50666

kairon/events/definitions/mail_channel.py (1)

47-51: Verify batch processing implementation

The batch processing implementation looks good, but let's verify that the batch size constant is properly configured and that the processor can handle partial batches correctly.

✅ Verification successful

Batch processing implementation is correctly configured and handles partial batches appropriately

The verification confirms:

  • The batch size constant PROCESS_MESSAGE_BATCH_SIZE is properly defined with a value of 8 in kairon/shared/channels/mail/constants.py
  • The implementation uses Python's standard slice notation emails[i:i + batch_size] which correctly handles partial batches at the end of the sequence
  • Similar batch processing pattern is only used in test code, not requiring any updates
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if batch size constant is defined and its value
rg -A 1 "PROCESS_MESSAGE_BATCH_SIZE\s*=\s*" --type py

# Check if there are any other batch processing implementations that might need similar updates
ast-grep --pattern 'for $_ in range(0, len($_), $_):
  $$$'

Length of output: 723

kairon/__init__.py (1)

48-48: Verify removal of mail_channel_process

The removal of mail_channel_process from imports aligns with the PR objectives. Let's verify that all related references have been cleaned up.

✅ Verification successful

Removal of mail_channel_process is clean

The search results confirm that mail_channel_process has been completely removed from the codebase. The mail processing functionality is now handled through mail_channel_read and the MailProcessor class, with no lingering references to the removed import. This change is consistent and complete.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to mail_channel_process
rg "mail_channel_process" --type py

# Check for any orphaned imports or unused mail processing code
rg "MailProcessEvent" --type py

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for mail-related functionality
rg -i "mail.*process" --type py

# Search for any mail channel related imports
rg "from.*mail.*channel.*import" --type py

# Check git diff to see the exact changes made
git diff origin/main... -- "**/mail_*.py" "**/*mail*.py"

Length of output: 15095

kairon/shared/channels/mail/processor.py (1)

274-274: Verify MailResponseLog schema update

The MailResponseLog initialization has been updated to use uid. Let's verify that the schema has been properly updated and that there's a migration plan for existing data.

✅ Verification successful

Schema is properly updated with uid field

The MailResponseLog schema already includes the uid field as an IntField with the required=True constraint, indicating it's a mandatory field. No migration is needed as the field is already part of the schema.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check MailResponseLog schema definition
rg -A 10 "class MailResponseLog" --type py

# Look for any migration scripts
fd -e py -e sql migration

Length of output: 873

tests/unit_test/channels/mail_channel_test.py (4)

175-175: LGTM: Mail log simplification

The change to use uid instead of storing message content (subject and body) in MailResponseLog is a good simplification that reduces data duplication and storage overhead.

Also applies to: 212-212


254-254: LGTM: Consistent mail log update

The modification maintains consistency with the updated MailResponseLog structure across test cases.


311-311: LGTM: Simplified mail reading logic

The removal of the time_shift parameter streamlines the mail reading functionality by eliminating the rescheduling mechanism, which aligns with the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 348-348


367-367: LGTM: Consistent logging structure

The change maintains consistency with the updated MailResponseLog structure throughout the test suite.

tests/unit_test/events/definitions_test.py (1)

1229-1230: LGTM: Streamlined test implementation

The test has been simplified to focus on core mail reading and processing functionality, aligning with the removal of the process action event.

Also applies to: 1234-1240

"""
return MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot)
return MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot) and MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix duplicate validation call

The validate method contains a duplicate call to validate_imap_connection:

-        return MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot) and MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot)
+        return MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
return MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot) and MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot)
return MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot)

"""
return MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot)
return MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot) and MailProcessor.validate_imap_connection(self.bot)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change to smtp and imap validation

ev.validate()
ev.enqueue(mails=[email])

emails, _ = vals
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove extra veriable vals (line)

@hasinaxp hasinaxp closed this Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants