-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
secret mapping corrected #1654
Merged
Merged
secret mapping corrected #1654
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as the verification is complete. The results show that
llm_secret
from Sysadmin contains multiple fields including 'api_key', 'api_version', and 'api_base_url' (as seen in the test files), while the environment variable fallback only sets 'api_key'.Standardize secret structure between Sysadmin and environment variable sources
The secret structure from Sysadmin includes additional fields ('api_version', 'api_base_url') that are missing in the environment variable fallback. This inconsistency could cause runtime errors when code attempts to access these fields.
kairon/shared/actions/utils.py
: Usesget()
safely for api_keytests/unit_test/admin/admin_processor_test.py
: Shows Sysadmin secrets contain 'api_key', 'api_version', 'api_base_url'kairon/nlu/classifiers/llm.py
: Environment fallback only sets 'api_key'Consider:
.get()
) for optional fields🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure consistent secret structure between sources
The secret structure differs between the two sources:
llm_secret
from Sysadmin is assigned directly{'api_key': value}
This could lead to issues if the code expects additional fields from
llm_secret
that won't be present when using the environment variable.Let's check how
llm_secret
is structured:Consider standardizing the secret structure by either:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 4412