Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some fixes #1127

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025
Merged

Some fixes #1127

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

SmittieC
Copy link
Collaborator

@SmittieC SmittieC commented Feb 3, 2025

Description

resolves #1117
resolves #1115
Fixes the likes of this issue

The issue was that we used the default queryset in the participant data list, which couldn't find archived experiments. If we only have data on a participant with archived experiments, an error is thrown. Since users can actually see archived experiments, I think it's fair to query them here as well.

User Impact

  • All participants will show up in the participant data screen. The user will be able to see which experiments are archived when viewing a particular participant's data
  • Better view when opening version details

Demo

Wider version details modal

image

We show when an experiment is archived

image

Docs

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 3, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
apps/experiments/models.py 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@SmittieC SmittieC merged commit fba14dd into main Feb 3, 2025
7 checks passed
@SmittieC SmittieC deleted the cs/fix_pd_error branch February 3, 2025 08:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Participant chip should use 'name' if there is one Make version details dialog wider to prevent overflow
3 participants