Feat/better compatibility and update ci cd

[vinitkumar]

Description

• Remove outdated code.
• Cleanup for Github actions and update some of the actions.

Related resources

• #...
• #...

Checklist

• I have opened this pull request against master
• I have added or modified the tests when changing logic
• I have followed the conventional commits guidelines to add meaningful information into the changelog
• I have read the contribution guidelines and I have joined #workgroup-pr-review on
  Slack to find a “pr review buddy” who is going to review my pull request.

Summary by Sourcery

Enhance compatibility by removing outdated code and update CI workflows to use the latest versions of GitHub Actions and Python.

Enhancements:

• Remove outdated code for better compatibility with newer Django versions.

CI:

• Update GitHub Actions workflows to use newer versions of actions and Python.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR focuses on updating CI/CD configurations and improving compatibility by updating GitHub Actions workflows and removing legacy Django compatibility code. The changes include updating action versions, adding Python 3.13 support, configuring Codecov token, and cleaning up deprecated Django 2.2 compatibility code.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update GitHub Actions workflow configurations	Update actions/checkout from v1/v3 to v4 Update actions/setup-python from v2/v4 to v5 Add Python 3.13 to test matrix Update codecov-action to v5 and add token configuration Improve YAML formatting and indentation	.github/workflows/test.yml .github/workflows/publish-to-test-pypi.yml .github/workflows/publish-to-live-pypi.yml .github/workflows/lint.yml
Remove legacy Django compatibility code	Remove Django 2.2 specific code path Simplify from_db_value method implementation	djangocms_attributes_field/fields.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @vinitkumar - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.

Blocking issues:

• from_db_value needs to return the result of _from_db_value (link)

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🔴 General issues: 1 blocking issue
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.36%. Comparing base (73007eb) to head (b9c6bb9).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #57      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.61%   90.36%   +0.75%     
==========================================
  Files           3        4       +1     
  Lines         154      166      +12     
  Branches       28       26       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits          138      150      +12     
  Misses         10       10              
  Partials        6        6              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[fsbraun]

I think the context argument should go away? https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/releases/2.0/#features-deprecated-in-2-0