-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JIT: Handle QMARK properly for LCL_ADDR propagation #103909
Conversation
The assertions created/used need to take into account that qmark arms are only conditionally executed.
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch |
@jkoritzinsky looks like there's some issues with the new jit-format job. |
Looking into it now |
Oddly large TP regressions. Apparently MSVC decided to stop inlining
|
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @AndyAyersMS No diffs. Large TP regressions from the inlining change shown in the comment above... I am hopeful that native PGO is going to sort that out. |
The assertions created/used need to take into account that qmark arms are only conditionally executed.