Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(storage): Use ToListAsync() instead of ToArrayAsync() #36

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2024
Merged

perf(storage): Use ToListAsync() instead of ToArrayAsync() #36

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

netcore-jroger
Copy link
Contributor

  • perf(storage): Use ToListAsync() instead of ToArrayAsync(), because ToArrayAsync() is a wrapper around ToListAsync().

@netcore-jroger netcore-jroger changed the title perf(storage): Use ToListAsync() instead of ToArrayAsync(), because ToArrayAsync() is a wrapper around ToListAsync() perf(storage): Use ToListAsync() instead of ToArrayAsync() Jan 22, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (a6910fe) 91.10% compared to head (ed2f0b1) 91.30%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #36      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.10%   91.30%   +0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines         989      989              
  Branches      105      105              
==========================================
+ Hits          901      903       +2     
+ Misses         60       59       -1     
+ Partials       28       27       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

…oArrayAsync() is a wrapper around ToListAsync()
@liuhaoyang liuhaoyang merged commit 16e465c into dotnetcore:main Jan 29, 2024
4 checks passed
@netcore-jroger netcore-jroger deleted the feature/storage branch January 29, 2024 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants