Tally the first congress results #30
Conversation
fixup: - misspelled capital item - capital export - labor #lang
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good!
If you have time tomorrow to stop by for the weekly ABE workshop, it would be great to have a short demo of the process you followed. We could also discuss any ideas for iterating on and improving the tallying process!
No worries if not, but it could also help me prepare for the RacketCon talk, which I haven't had a chance to start working on yet, lol 😅
| "ideas.rkt") | ||
| "../appraisal/deanonymized/capital.md" | ||
| "../appraisal/deanonymized/labor.md" | ||
| "../antecedents/antecedents.md") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should definitely change to using a custom extension, maybe .dia, instead of .md (not for this PR - just noting). I'll create an issue on the DIA repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Created: drym-org/dia#12
| ("SourceHut" . 0.06) | ||
| ("IMVU" . 0.06) | ||
| ("BitBucket" . 0.06) | ||
| ("TravisCI" . 0.06)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A bit more lopsided than the other ones we've done, but that's to be expected given it's a smaller project! Also that technically works out to ~23% each for 3 people, so that's quite an interesting result, and a nontrivial amount of money even for upstream projects like GitHub (probably $50 from the first payout! I'm not sure we are in a position to pay companies yet, but we are working on that. We need legal help setting up a nonprofit to be the universal ABE trustee/payer. Please lmk if you know any lawyers or tax accountants (or perhaps organizations you encountered at All Things Open? 🙂 ) who would be willing to work either pro bono or under ABE attribution to help us set this up).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My parents are both CPAs; my mother is on the corporate side and my father does non-profits, small businesses, personal, etc. I'm not sure about pro bono 😅
The other thing would be to check with the Open Source Initiative or folks like them to see what resources or contacts they have.
The first handful of commits are actually script and data cleanup (including deanonymizing capital), and could probably be picked on their own if something is wrong with the tally commit.
The last commit tallys the results and commits them. I had to double-check the multiple-contributor syntax (that's
(("a" "b" "c") . percent), but it looks right based on dia-qi.