-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expr_constant(, typed_logical_null = )
#161
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
expr_constant(, typed_logical_null = )
#161
Conversation
exprs <- list( | ||
y = expr_constant(NA, TRUE) | ||
) | ||
expect_equal(rel_to_altrep(rel_project(rel1, exprs))[, ], NA) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a more straightforward way to convert a constant to a SEXP rather that having to round trip through a data frame ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For our use case, this is best. You could add a wrapper function in this package?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A function that turns a constant into an R value ?
@@ -60,11 +60,11 @@ external_pointer<T> make_external_prot(const string &rclass, SEXP prot, ARGS &&. | |||
return make_external<ColumnRefExpression>("duckdb_expr", names); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
[[cpp11::register]] SEXP rapi_expr_constant(sexp val) { | |||
[[cpp11::register]] SEXP rapi_expr_constant(sexp val, bool typed_logical_null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this should instead not have the typed_logical_null
argument, handle val == R_NilValue
upfront, and use RApiTypes::SexpToValue(val, 0, true)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How so? I just changed this to typed_logical_null := false
to support a special case in duckdb. I need to better understand the original motivation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe expr_constant(NA)
should make a constant that is a NULL LOGICAL, not a NULL SQL, the same way expr_constant(NA_integer_)
makes a NULL INTEGER constant.
And then we could tweak expr_constant()
so that expr_constant(NULL)
would return a SQLNULL
With this PR, if we wanted to construct a LOGICAL NULL
we need to expr_constant(NA, TRUE)
.
I perhaps miss background about the special case that warranted for using typed_logical_null := false
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, Romain!
exprs <- list( | ||
y = expr_constant(NA, TRUE) | ||
) | ||
expect_equal(rel_to_altrep(rel_project(rel1, exprs))[, ], NA) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For our use case, this is best. You could add a wrapper function in this package?
@@ -60,11 +60,11 @@ external_pointer<T> make_external_prot(const string &rclass, SEXP prot, ARGS &&. | |||
return make_external<ColumnRefExpression>("duckdb_expr", names); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
[[cpp11::register]] SEXP rapi_expr_constant(sexp val) { | |||
[[cpp11::register]] SEXP rapi_expr_constant(sexp val, bool typed_logical_null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How so? I just changed this to typed_logical_null := false
to support a special case in duckdb. I need to better understand the original motivation.
This is related to hannes/duckdb-rfuns#91 (comment)
This allows
expr_constant()
to construct a NULL constant of type LOGICAL which wasn't possible before.Perhaps a better alternative would be to allow
expr_constant(NULL)
to construct aSQLNULL
and letexpr_constant(NA)
to construct aValue(LogicalType::BOOLEAN)
?expr_constant(NULL)
is currently an error