Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve VPN underlying error detail #806

Conversation

diegoreymendez
Copy link
Contributor

@diegoreymendez diegoreymendez commented May 2, 2024

Task/Issue URL: https://app.asana.com/0/0/1207221937455192/f
iOS PR: duckduckgo/iOS#2813
macOS PR: duckduckgo/macos-browser#2736
What kind of version bump will this require?: Major/Minor/Patch

Description

Improves VPN underlying error detail for NetworkProtectionClientError and WireGuardError.

Testing

  1. Disable dryMode for the packet tunnel provider.
  2. In PacketTunnelProvider right after the tunnel starts throw any NetworkProtectionClientError or WireGuardError with underlying error information.
  3. Check in Kibana after a bit that you see the pixel data.

Internal references:

Pull Request Review Checklist
Software Engineering Expectations
Technical Design Template
Pull Request Documentation

@diegoreymendez diegoreymendez self-assigned this May 2, 2024
@diegoreymendez diegoreymendez changed the base branch from main to release/141.1.2-1 May 2, 2024 15:59
@diegoreymendez diegoreymendez marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2024 15:59
@alessandroboron alessandroboron requested review from alessandroboron and removed request for alessandroboron May 3, 2024 08:09
@alessandroboron alessandroboron removed their request for review May 3, 2024 08:30
@diegoreymendez diegoreymendez merged commit 35730c7 into release/141.1.2-1 May 3, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@diegoreymendez diegoreymendez deleted the diego/improve-error-reporting-for-NetworkProtectionClientError branch May 3, 2024 08:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants