Do not delete the AgentUserRelation

[flvndvd]

Description

This PR updates the existing remove draft agent configuration scripts to avoid deleting the UserAgentRelation.

I took the opportunity to add some concurrency by bringing concurrentExecutor in types. We have an existing implementation in connectors that uses p-queue 🤮. This one is pure TS.

Will update connectors to use this new implementation.

Risk

Deploy Plan

[flvndvd]

Tested with:

async function main() {
  const items = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];

  console.log("Starting execution...");

  const results = await concurrentExecutor(
    items,
    async (item, idx) => {
      console.log(`Starting task ${idx} (value: ${item})`);

      // Random delay.
      const delay = Math.floor(Math.random() * 2000) + 1000;
      await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, delay));

      console.log(`Completed task ${idx} (value: ${item}) after ${delay}ms`);
      return item * 2;
    },
    { concurrency: 3 }
  );

  console.log("All tasks completed!");
  console.log("Results:", results);
}

main().catch(console.error);

Yields:

Starting execution...
Starting task 0 (value: 1)
Starting task 1 (value: 2)
Starting task 2 (value: 3)
Completed task 1 (value: 2) after 1213ms
Starting task 3 (value: 4)
Completed task 2 (value: 3) after 1592ms
Starting task 4 (value: 5)
Completed task 3 (value: 4) after 1571ms
Starting task 5 (value: 6)
Completed task 0 (value: 1) after 2803ms
Starting task 6 (value: 7)
Completed task 4 (value: 5) after 1259ms
Starting task 7 (value: 8)
Completed task 7 (value: 8) after 2066ms
Starting task 8 (value: 9)
Completed task 6 (value: 7) after 2322ms
Starting task 9 (value: 10)
Completed task 5 (value: 6) after 2557ms
Completed task 9 (value: 10) after 1817ms
Completed task 8 (value: 9) after 2269ms
All tasks completed!
Results: [
   2,  4,  6,  8, 10,
  12, 14, 16, 18, 20
]

[Fraggle]

I took the opportunity to add some concurrency by bringing concurrentExecutor in types. We have an existing implementation in connectors that uses p-queue 🤮. This one is pure TS.

WHyyyyyyyy oh whyyy ? :)

(more seriously, if we already had one way, why add another way ?)

[flvndvd]

I took the opportunity to add some concurrency by bringing concurrentExecutor in types. We have an existing implementation in connectors that uses p-queue 🤮. This one is pure TS.

WHyyyyyyyy oh whyyy ? :)

(more seriously, if we already had one way, why add another way ?)

p-queue isn't a dependency of front and we had some bundling issue in the past with their library.