Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Persist the sequence number if it changes to the document #1542

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

laeubi
Copy link
Contributor

@laeubi laeubi commented Dec 31, 2024

Currently the targetdefinition is maintaining a sequence number that should roughly reflect the number of times a relevant property of the target file changes. Currently this number is never written out to the XML making it only effective at runtime but not e.g. when committed to a VCS if not maintained manually.

This now makes sure that the number is correctly persisted in the XML.

Currently the targetdefinition is maintaining a sequence number that
should roughly reflect the number of times a relevant property of the
target file changes. Currently this number is never written out to the
XML making it only effective at runtime but not e.g. when committed to a
VCS if not maintained manually.

This now makes sure that the number is correctly persisted in the XML.
@HannesWell
Copy link
Member

Isn't this the opposite direction as started with your other PRs?

Therefore I'm not sure we should continue here.

@laeubi
Copy link
Contributor Author

laeubi commented Dec 31, 2024

Unless it is not removed, it should at least work... but it looks like making it work / persisted already breaks a lot of stuff, so it serves as another proof that maybe removing it completely is a better choice.

@laeubi
Copy link
Contributor Author

laeubi commented Dec 31, 2024

This one would be obsolete if we merge:

@laeubi laeubi closed this Dec 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants