Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEATURE/HCMPRE-1111 : Sample Ticket for reference #2042

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jagankumar-egov
Copy link
Collaborator

@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov commented Dec 16, 2024

Feature Request

JIRA ID
HCMPRE-1111

Module
Console/Microplan/Core/Product

Description
Description about the ticket

Related Issues
related issues or feature/ impact etc


Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the README.md file for the DIGIT UI project. A new section titled "Starting with Digit-UI App (Implementation Teams) - MICRO-UI" has been added, providing specific instructions for running the UI from the micro-ui/web subdirectory. The existing instructions have been slightly restructured for improved clarity, and a logo image has been appended to enhance the visual presentation of the document.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md - Added new section for running UI from micro-ui/web subdirectory
- Restructured existing local run instructions
- Appended logo image at the end of the document

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • nipunarora-eGov

Poem

🐰 A README's tale, fresh and bright,
Micro-UI steps now in clear light
Yarn spinning code with gentle care
Instructions bloom beyond compare
A logo gleams, our project's might! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
README.md (4)

Line range hint 110-124: Consider adding environment variables section for implementation teams

The original section includes detailed environment variables, but they're missing from the implementation teams' section. Consider either:

  1. Adding environment variables section for implementation teams, or
  2. Clarifying if they use the same variables

Line range hint 110-124: Add sample .env file reference for implementation teams

The original section includes a link to a sample .env file, but it's missing from the implementation teams' section. Consider adding a similar reference to help users get started quickly.

Add .env file

```bash
    micro-ui/web/.env

+sample .env file


---

Line range hint `1-124`: **Improve document structure and organization**

Consider reorganizing the README to:
1. Move the new implementation section next to the original "Run Locally" section
2. Group related information together
3. Add a table of contents for better navigation

This would make the document more cohesive and easier to follow.

---

Based on the package.json files and README content, I can now provide a clear response about the different paths:

**Clarify the implementation paths in the README**

The `micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals` is the core development path containing all source modules, libraries and components, while `micro-ui/web` is the main application that consumes these packages. Here's why:

- `micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals` contains the source code for all UI modules, libraries and components as workspaces
- `micro-ui/web` is the main application that imports these modules as dependencies (see @egovernments/* dependencies)

Recommend updating the README to clarify:
- `micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals` - Use this path for core development and contributing to the UI modules/components
- `micro-ui/web` - Use this path for implementing applications that consume the DIGIT-UI modules



<details>
<summary>🔗 Analysis chain</summary>

Line range hint `110-124`: **Clarify the differences between implementation paths**

The README now shows two different paths for running the UI:
1. `micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals` (original)
2. `micro-ui/web` (new implementation team path)

This might confuse users about which path to follow. Please clarify:
1. When should each path be used?
2. What are the differences between these implementations?
3. Are there any specific considerations for each approach?

Let's verify the directory structure and documentation consistency:

---

Let me gather more information about the structure and purpose of these directories:

</details>

<details>
<summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary>

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Check if both directories exist and their structure
fd -t d "micro-ui/web$"
fd -t d "micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals$"

# Check for any additional documentation about these paths
rg -A 3 "micro-ui/web" --type md

Length of output: 13692


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json files in both paths to understand their purposes
echo "=== micro-ui/web/package.json ==="
fd "package.json$" micro-ui/web -d 1 -x cat {}

echo -e "\n=== micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/package.json ==="
fd "package.json$" micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals -d 1 -x cat {}

# Check if there are any README files explaining the difference
echo -e "\n=== Looking for implementation details in READMEs ==="
rg -i "implement|internal|team" micro-ui/web/README.md || true
rg -i "implement|internal|team" micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/README.md || true

Length of output: 6676

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60b5fb2 and 9bc185a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov changed the title Update README.md FEATURE/HCMPRE-1111 Dec 16, 2024
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov changed the title FEATURE/HCMPRE-1111 FEATURE/HCMPRE-1111 : Sample Ticket for reference Dec 16, 2024
jagankumar-egov added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Sample Ticket for reference #2042
jagankumar-egov added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
@jagankumar-egov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Refer this sample ticket format for any New PRS for Master, Develop & Console branches.

@egovernments/core-ui-team

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant