Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Rule] Adding Coverage for AWS STS AssumeRoot by Rare User and Member Account #4271

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

terrancedejesus
Copy link
Contributor

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus commented Nov 25, 2024

Pull Request

Issue link(s):

Summary - What I changed

Adds detection coverage for AWS' new AssumeRoot API call. An investigation guide has also been added for this rule.

Identifies when the STS AssumeRoot action is performed by a rare user in AWS. The AssumeRoot action allows users to assume the root member account role, granting elevated but specific permissions based on the task policy specified. Adversaries whom may have compromised user credentials, such as access and secret keys, can use this technique to escalate privileges and gain unauthorized access to AWS resources. This is a New Terms rule that identifies
when the STS AssumeRoot action is performed by a user that rarely assumes this role and specific member account.

How To Test

Simulation:

Checklist

  • Added a label for the type of pr: bug, enhancement, schema, maintenance, Rule: New, Rule: Deprecation, Rule: Tuning, Hunt: New, or Hunt: Tuning so guidelines can be generated
  • Added the meta:rapid-merge label if planning to merge within 24 hours
  • Secret and sensitive material has been managed correctly
  • Automated testing was updated or added to match the most common scenarios
  • Documentation and comments were added for features that require explanation

Contributor checklist

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus added Integration: AWS AWS related rules Domain: Cloud Rule: New Proposal for new rule labels Nov 25, 2024
@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus self-assigned this Nov 25, 2024
@protectionsmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus changed the title [New Rule] Adding Coverage for 'AWS STS AssumeRoot by Rare User and Member Account' [New Rule] Adding Coverage for AWS STS AssumeRoot by Rare User and Member Account Nov 25, 2024
@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus merged commit 2d79494 into main Nov 25, 2024
29 checks passed
@terrancedejesus terrancedejesus deleted the new-rule-aws-sts-assumeroot branch November 25, 2024 15:28
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants