Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updating cloud for release notes in asciidoc #3201

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

georgewallace
Copy link
Contributor

@georgewallace georgewallace commented Apr 7, 2025

Updating the conf.yaml for the cloud release notes that will be staying in asciidoc.

@georgewallace georgewallace requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2025 17:06
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2025

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@georgewallace
Copy link
Contributor Author

@KOTungseth PR for the docs repo for the release notes. I think I got this right.

lcawl
lcawl previously approved these changes Apr 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@lcawl lcawl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the builds pass, LGTM

@lcawl
Copy link
Contributor

lcawl commented Apr 7, 2025

Seeing all these broken links makes me question whether rather than removing all the pages from https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/cloud/current/index.html (except release notes) is the right path forward or whether it's simpler to just create a "new" book that contains only the release notes. Since redirects are being created for all those pages, IMO that saves us from having to do all this clean up of broken links. I've created #3202 to test that alternative

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants